Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 349 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $172.00 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -4.2%/yr for a decade (off $196M normalized FCF).
The market's -4.2% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt -$223M
mean -8.8% · volatility σ 77% · implied rate exceeded in 5/8 yrs
Central path = implied -4.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (77%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 229 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $852.5B | 39.1× | — | 1.2× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $396.2B | 49.1× | 30.3× | 1.4× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.5× | 4,050 |
| KO | $378.9B | 29.0× | 24.9× | 7.9× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $346.8B | 22.7× | 16.4× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $296.4B | 26.2× | 17.3× | 7.3× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $183.0B | 22.3× | 14.9× | 1.9× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| MO | $116.7B | 16.9× | 13.6× | 5.0× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 31.3% | 2.5× | 2,375 |
| MDLZ | $80.3B | 32.8× | 18.9× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| TGT | $72.4B | 19.7× | 10.5× | 0.7× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| CL | $70.3B | 33.4× | 19.6× | 3.5× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 26.5% | 2.0× | 1,873 |
| MNST | $43.5B | — | 16.4× | 5.3× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| KDP | $42.7B | 20.5× | 14.3× | 2.6× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| ADM | $42.6B | 39.5× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| FMX | $41.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| JBS | $39.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| KR | $39.6B | 39.5× | 10.0× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 4.7% | 3.0× | 1,327 |
| SYY | $38.6B | 21.2× | 9.7× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $34.2B | 23.5× | 11.7× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 12.0% | 0.5× | 967 |
| HSY | $34.1B | — | 20.1× | 2.9× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| EL | $33.8B | — | 768.2× | 2.4× | -8.2% | 74.0% | -7.9% | -29.3% | -29.3% | 0.1× | 800 |
| KMB | $32.6B | 16.2× | 10.3× | 2.0× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KHC | $29.3B | — | — | 1.2× | -3.5% | 33.3% | -23.4% | -14.0% | -14.0% | — | 1,059 |
| DG | $27.5B | 18.2× | 8.1× | 0.6× | 5.2% | 30.7% | 3.5% | 17.8% | 17.8% | — | 1,099 |
| KOF | $23.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 249 |
| CHD | $23.1B | 31.5× | 18.8× | 3.7× | 1.6% | 44.7% | 11.9% | 18.4% | 11.9% | 1.7× | 1,004 |
| SAM | $1.9B | 17.4× | 7.1× | 1.0× | -2.4% | 48.5% | 5.5% | 12.8% | 12.8% | — | 349 |
Peers = companies sharing SAM's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.96B 100.0% | $2.01B 100.0% | $2.01B 100.0% | $2.09B 100.0% | $2.06B 100.0% | $1.74B 100.0% | $1.25B 100.0% | $995.6M 100.0% | $863.0M 100.0% | $906.4M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.01B 51.5% | $1.12B 55.6% | $1.16B 57.6% | $1.23B 58.8% | $1.26B 61.2% | $922.0M 53.1% | $635.7M 50.9% | $483.4M 48.6% | $413.1M 47.9% | $446.8M 49.3% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $413.1M 47.9% | $446.8M 49.3% |
| Gross Profit | $952.6M 48.5% | $893.7M 44.4% | $852.4M 42.4% | $862.0M 41.2% | $797.8M 38.8% | $814.5M 46.9% | $614.2M 49.1% | $512.2M 51.4% | $449.9M 52.1% | $459.7M 50.7% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $190.8M 9.7% | $189.9M 9.4% | $174.5M 8.7% | $157.5M 7.5% | $133.6M 6.5% | $118.2M 6.8% | $112.7M 9.0% | $90.9M 9.1% | $73.1M 8.5% | $78.0M 8.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $807.7M 41.1% | $817.8M 40.6% | $752.4M 37.5% | $771.2M 36.9% | $789.8M 38.4% | $570.2M 32.8% | $469.3M 37.5% | $396.4M 39.8% | $334.2M 38.7% | $322.0M 35.5% |
| Operating Income | $144.9M 7.4% | $76.0M 3.8% | $100.0M 5.0% | $90.8M 4.3% | $8.0M 0.4% | $244.2M 14.1% | $144.9M 11.6% | $115.9M 11.6% | $115.7M 13.4% | $137.7M 15.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $8.6M 0.4% | $11.6M 0.6% | $9.6M 0.5% | $645K 0.0% | -$1.1M -0.1% | $23K 0.0% | -$542K -0.0% | $405K 0.0% | $467K 0.1% | -$538K -0.1% |
| Pretax Income | $153.5M 7.8% | $87.6M 4.4% | $109.6M 5.5% | $91.4M 4.4% | $6.9M 0.3% | $244.2M 14.1% | $144.4M 11.6% | $116.3M 11.7% | $116.1M 13.5% | $137.1M 15.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | $45.0M 2.3% | $27.9M 1.4% | $33.3M 1.7% | $24.2M 1.2% | -$7.6M -0.4% | $52.3M 3.0% | $34.3M 2.7% | $23.6M 2.4% | $17.1M 2.0% | $49.8M 5.5% |
| Net Income | $108.5M 5.5% | $59.7M 3.0% | $76.3M 3.8% | $67.3M 3.2% | $14.6M 0.7% | $192.0M 11.1% | $110.0M 8.8% | $92.7M 9.3% | $99.0M 11.5% | $87.3M 9.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $9.90 | $5.07 | $6.23 | $5.46 | $1.19 | $15.73 | $9.26 | $7.90 | $8.18 | $6.93 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $9.89 | $5.06 | $6.21 | $5.44 | $1.17 | $15.53 | $9.16 | $7.82 | $8.09 | $6.79 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 11.0M | 11.8M | 12.2M | 12.3M | 12.3M | 12.2M | 11.9M | 11.7M | 12.1M | 12.6M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 10.9M | 11.8M | 12.3M | 12.3M | 12.4M | 12.3M | 11.9M | 11.7M | 12.2M | 12.8M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
7/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $202M buybacks = $202M returned on $216M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 13%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 48.6 | 50.9 | 53.1 | 61.2 | 58.8 | 57.6 | 55.6 | 51.5 |
| Gross Profit | 51.4 | 49.1 | 46.9 | 38.8 | 41.2 | 42.4 | 44.4 | 48.5 |
| SG&A | 9.1 | 9.0 | 6.8 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 8.7 | 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Operating Income | 11.6 | 11.6 | 14.1 | 0.4 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 3.8 | 7.4 |
| Income Tax | 2.4 | 2.7 | 3.0 | -0.4 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 2.3 |
| Net Income | 9.3 | 8.8 | 11.1 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 3.0 | 5.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on SAM: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.