Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 323 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $36.00 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 8.5%/yr for a decade (off $81M normalized FCF).
The market's 8.5% is in line with its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.06B shares · net debt -$455M
mean -21.1% · volatility σ 171% · implied rate exceeded in 3/6 yrs
Central path = implied 8.5%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (171%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $81M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -95%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.18B 100.0% | $901.5M 100.0% | $2.98B 100.0% | $3.11B 100.0% | $1.96B 100.0% | $1.46B 100.0% | $1.43B 100.0% | $937.2M 100.0% | $607.0M 100.0% | $489.8M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $988.2M 83.4% | $1.78B 197.3% | $2.27B 76.4% | $2.27B 72.8% | $1.33B 68.0% | $997.9M 68.4% | $946.3M 66.4% | $618.0M 65.9% | $392.3M 64.6% | $337.9M 69.0% |
| Gross Profit | $196.3M 16.6% | -$877.2M -97.3% | $703.8M 23.6% | $844.6M 27.2% | $629.3M 32.0% | $461.4M 31.6% | $479.3M 33.6% | $319.2M 34.1% | $214.8M 35.4% | $152.0M 31.0% |
| Research & Development | $221.3M 18.7% | $277.2M 30.8% | $321.5M 10.8% | $289.8M 9.3% | $219.6M 11.2% | $163.1M 11.2% | $121.4M 8.5% | $82.2M 8.8% | $55.0M 9.1% | $33.2M 6.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $101.0M 8.5% | $147.5M 16.4% | $146.5M 4.9% | $112.5M 3.6% | $82.2M 4.2% | $63.1M 4.3% | $49.4M 3.5% | $29.3M 3.1% | $18.7M 3.1% | $12.1M 2.5% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $498.0M 42.0% | $831.1M 92.2% | $663.6M 22.3% | $678.5M 21.8% | $422.2M 21.5% | $318.8M 21.8% | $289.4M 20.3% | $179.8M 19.2% | $123.7M 20.4% | $80.2M 16.4% |
| Operating Income | -$301.7M -25.5% | -$1.71B -189.5% | $40.2M 1.4% | $166.1M 5.3% | $207.1M 10.5% | $142.6M 9.8% | $189.9M 13.3% | $139.4M 14.9% | $91.1M 15.0% | $71.8M 14.6% |
| Interest Expense | $1.4M 0.1% | $1.2M 0.1% | $1.3M 0.0% | $1.5M 0.0% | $605K 0.0% | $5.3M 0.4% | $4.8M 0.3% | $2.5M 0.3% | — | — |
| Interest & Investment Income | $10.8M 0.9% | $16.4M 1.8% | $7.5M 0.3% | $2.9M 0.1% | $788K 0.0% | $67K 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$72.0M -6.1% | -$14.6M -1.6% | $41.2M 1.4% | $3.8M 0.1% | -$20.0M -1.0% | -$21.1M -1.4% | -$11.3M -0.8% | -$2.3M -0.2% | $9.2M 1.5% | $471K 0.1% |
| Pretax Income | -$391.1M -33.0% | -$1.71B -189.5% | $81.1M 2.7% | $177.2M 5.7% | $187.2M 9.5% | $163.7M 11.2% | $178.6M 12.5% | $137.1M 14.6% | $100.2M 16.5% | $72.2M 14.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $13.4M 1.1% | $96.2M 10.7% | $46.4M 1.6% | $83.4M 2.7% | $18.1M 0.9% | $23.3M 1.6% | $33.6M 2.4% | $9.1M 1.0% | $16.1M 2.6% | -$4.4M -0.9% |
| Net Income | -$405.4M -34.2% | -$1.81B -200.4% | $34.3M 1.2% | $93.8M 3.0% | $169.2M 8.6% | $140.3M 9.6% | $146.5M 10.3% | $128.8M 13.7% | $84.2M 13.9% | $76.6M 15.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-6.88 | $-31.64 | $0.61 | $1.70 | $3.24 | $2.79 | $3.06 | $2.85 | $1.99 | $1.92 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-6.88 | $-31.64 | $0.60 | $1.65 | $3.06 | $2.66 | $2.90 | $2.69 | $1.85 | $1.73 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 59.0M | 57.1M | 56.6M | 55.1M | 52.2M | 50.2M | 47.9M | 45.2M | 42.2M | 40.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 59.0M | 57.1M | 57.2M | 58.1M | 56.0M | 52.8M | 50.2M | 48.0M | 45.4M | 44.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $682.3B | 24.4× | — | 2.0× | -5.0% | — | 8.7% | 11.1% | 10.7% | — | 4,568 |
| SHEL | $545.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,521 |
| CVX | $391.2B | 31.9× | — | 2.1× | -6.8% | 42.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 6.6% | — | 4,121 |
| TTE | $202.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 951 |
| COP | $166.8B | 21.0× | — | 2.8× | 7.7% | 62.1% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 12.2% | — | 2,450 |
| PBR | $155.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 524 |
| MPC | $128.7B | 31.9× | 11.0× | 1.0× | -4.4% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 23.4% | 20.6% | 0.2× | 1,802 |
| VLO | $127.5B | 54.5× | 24.1× | 1.0× | -5.5% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.7× | 1,781 |
| BP | $117.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,220 |
| PSX | $111.3B | 25.4× | — | 0.8× | -7.5% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 15.1% | 14.6% | — | 2,041 |
| EQNR | $110.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 398 |
| WMB | $87.7B | 33.6× | 17.8× | 7.3× | 13.8% | — | 21.9% | 20.4% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,736 |
| EPD | $84.1B | — | 12.6× | 1.6× | -6.4% | 26.7% | 11.0% | — | — | 3.7× | 1,573 |
| EOG | $79.0B | 15.9× | 7.7× | 3.5× | -4.5% | — | 22.0% | 16.7% | 13.2% | 0.7× | 1,525 |
| SLB | $77.9B | 22.2× | — | 2.2× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 1,624 |
| ET | $72.5B | — | 9.8× | 0.8× | 3.5% | 25.8% | 5.2% | 9.0% | 3.8% | 4.8× | 1,244 |
| KMI | $69.7B | 22.9× | 14.2× | 4.1× | 12.2% | — | 18.0% | 9.8% | 4.8% | 4.5× | 1,745 |
| TRGP | $61.2B | 33.6× | 16.2× | 3.6× | 3.9% | 38.3% | 11.3% | 62.7% | 9.4% | 3.6× | 979 |
| TS | $60.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 248 |
| MPLX | $59.4B | — | — | 4.6× | 8.9% | — | 38.1% | — | — | — | 622 |
| LNG | $59.3B | 11.2× | 7.8× | 3.0× | 27.2% | — | 26.7% | 67.3% | 17.3% | 2.2× | 1,303 |
| OKE | $58.7B | 17.2× | 12.4× | 1.8× | 55.0% | 30.5% | 10.1% | 15.1% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,622 |
| OXY | $58.5B | 36.8× | — | 2.7× | -1.9% | — | 11.0% | 6.6% | 4.2% | — | 1,250 |
| BKR | $56.2B | — | — | 2.0× | -0.3% | — | 9.3% | 13.7% | 13.3% | — | 1,095 |
| FANG | $56.0B | 34.4× | 11.2× | 3.7× | 35.8% | — | 11.1% | 4.5% | 3.2% | 2.3× | 1,141 |
| SEDG | $2.2B | — | — | 1.8× | 31.4% | 16.6% | -34.2% | -94.8% | -94.8% | — | 323 |
Peers = companies sharing SEDG's sector (Energy) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 11-yr range · 50th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 11-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 65.9 | 66.4 | 68.4 | 68.0 | 72.8 | 76.4 | 197.3 | 83.4 |
| Gross Profit | 34.1 | 33.6 | 31.6 | 32.0 | 27.2 | 23.6 | -97.3 | 16.6 |
| R&D | 8.8 | 8.5 | 11.2 | 11.2 | 9.3 | 10.8 | 30.8 | 18.7 |
| SG&A | 3.1 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 4.9 | 16.4 | 8.5 |
| Operating Income | 14.9 | 13.3 | 9.8 | 10.5 | 5.3 | 1.4 | -189.5 | -25.5 |
| Income Tax | 1.0 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 10.7 | 1.1 |
| Net Income | 13.7 | 10.3 | 9.6 | 8.6 | 3.0 | 1.2 | -200.4 | -34.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on SEDG: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.