Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 189 of 5,944 reporting institutions (91th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 4%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $43M covers the $19M due within a year 2.2× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2024-03-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~7.1% on $466M of debt.
Cash of $43M is below short-term debt of $96M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $183.87 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -10.1%/yr for a decade (off $298M normalized FCF).
The market's -10.1% is more conservative than its 6-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt $423M
mean -11.9% · volatility σ 102% · implied rate exceeded in 2/3 yrs
Central path = implied -10.1%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (102%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $23000 dividends + $12M buybacks = $12M returned on $298M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
No trend data available for this metric.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.58B 100.0% | $1.46B 100.0% | $1.51B 100.0% | $1.39B 100.0% | $1.47B 100.0% | $1.34B 100.0% | $1.20B 100.0% | $1.31B 100.0% | — | $1.26B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.43B 90.5% | $1.27B 87.1% | $1.41B 93.1% | $1.24B 89.8% | $1.24B 84.2% | $1.19B 89.4% | $1.16B 96.7% | $1.08B 82.3% | — | $1.15B 91.1% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1.14B 90.3% |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $81.0M 6.2% | — | $112.0M 8.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $75.5M 4.8% | $81.2M 5.6% | $81.1M 5.4% | $76.3M 5.5% | $80.0M 5.4% | $77.0M 5.8% | $72.5M 6.0% | $70.2M 5.3% | — | $73.0M 5.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.50B 95.1% | $1.35B 92.6% | $1.49B 98.6% | $1.32B 95.4% | $1.29B 87.7% | $1.27B 94.7% | $1.24B 103.2% | $1.15B 87.3% | — | $1.22B 96.4% |
| Operating Income | $77.8M 4.9% | $107.2M 7.4% | $21.4M 1.4% | $64.0M 4.6% | $181.1M 12.3% | $70.5M 5.3% | -$38.1M -3.2% | $14.8M 1.1% | — | $34.7M 2.8% |
| Interest Expense | $33.2M 2.1% | $34.0M 2.3% | $14.3M 0.9% | $5.6M 0.4% | $6.1M 0.4% | $11.8M 0.9% | $15.4M 1.3% | $12.8M 1.0% | — | $9.7M 0.8% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $967K 0.1% | $699K 0.0% | $528K 0.0% | $63K 0.0% | $42K 0.0% | $25K 0.0% | $28K 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $10.0M 0.6% | $9.8M 0.7% | $6.8M 0.4% | $9.3M 0.7% | -$3.5M -0.2% | $7.0M 0.5% | $4.3M 0.4% | $6.7M 0.5% | — | — |
| Pretax Income | $54.5M 3.5% | $83.0M 5.7% | $13.8M 0.9% | $59.9M 4.3% | $160.0M 10.9% | $65.6M 4.9% | -$49.3M -4.1% | $8.7M 0.7% | — | $25.6M 2.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $13.3M 0.8% | $19.7M 1.3% | $4.6M 0.3% | $13.7M 1.0% | $33.9M 2.3% | $14.4M 1.1% | -$12.8M -1.1% | -$1.3M -0.1% | — | $9.8M 0.8% |
| Net Income | $41.2M 2.6% | $63.3M 4.3% | $9.2M 0.6% | $46.2M 3.3% | $126.1M 8.6% | $52.3M 3.9% | $5.7M 0.5% | -$8.5M -0.6% | $11.8M | $15.9M 1.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $5.95 | $8.64 | $1.19 | $5.28 | $13.82 | $5.62 | $0.59 | $-0.87 | — | $1.61 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $5.90 | $8.56 | $1.16 | $5.24 | $13.72 | $5.58 | $0.59 | $-0.87 | — | $1.60 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 6.9M | 7.3M | 7.8M | 9K | 9K | 9.3M | 9.7M | 10K | — | 10K |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 7.0M | 7.4M | 7.9M | 9K | 9K | 9.3M | 9.7M | 10K | — | 10K |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 229 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $852.5B | 39.1× | — | 1.2× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $396.2B | 49.1× | 30.3× | 1.4× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.5× | 4,050 |
| KO | $378.9B | 29.0× | 24.9× | 7.9× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $346.8B | 22.7× | 16.4× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $296.4B | 26.2× | 17.3× | 7.3× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $183.0B | 22.3× | 14.9× | 1.9× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| MO | $116.7B | 16.9× | 13.6× | 5.0× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 31.3% | 2.5× | 2,375 |
| MDLZ | $80.3B | 32.8× | 18.9× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| TGT | $72.4B | 19.7× | 10.5× | 0.7× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| CL | $70.3B | 33.4× | 19.6× | 3.5× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 26.5% | 2.0× | 1,873 |
| MNST | $43.5B | — | 16.4× | 5.3× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| KDP | $42.7B | 20.5× | 14.3× | 2.6× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| ADM | $42.6B | 39.5× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| FMX | $41.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| JBS | $39.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| KR | $39.6B | 39.5× | 10.0× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 4.7% | 3.0× | 1,327 |
| SYY | $38.6B | 21.2× | 9.7× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $34.2B | 23.5× | 11.7× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 12.0% | 0.5× | 967 |
| HSY | $34.1B | — | 20.1× | 2.9× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| EL | $33.8B | — | 768.2× | 2.4× | -8.2% | 74.0% | -7.9% | -29.3% | -29.3% | 0.1× | 800 |
| KMB | $32.6B | 16.2× | 10.3× | 2.0× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KHC | $29.3B | — | — | 1.2× | -3.5% | 33.3% | -23.4% | -14.0% | -14.0% | — | 1,059 |
| DG | $27.5B | 18.2× | 8.1× | 0.6× | 5.2% | 30.7% | 3.5% | 17.8% | 17.8% | — | 1,099 |
| KOF | $23.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 249 |
| CHD | $23.1B | 31.5× | 18.8× | 3.7× | 1.6% | 44.7% | 11.9% | 18.4% | 11.9% | 1.7× | 1,004 |
| SENEA | $1.3B | 31.2× | 13.8× | 0.8× | 8.2% | 9.5% | 2.6% | 6.5% | 3.8% | 3.8× | 189 |
Peers = companies sharing SENEA's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 15-yr range · 92th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 15-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 82.3 | 96.7 | 89.4 | 84.2 | 89.8 | 93.1 | 87.1 | 90.5 |
| Gross Profit | 6.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | 5.3 | 6.0 | 5.8 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 5.4 | 5.6 | 4.8 |
| Operating Income | 1.1 | -3.2 | 5.3 | 12.3 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 7.4 | 4.9 |
| Income Tax | -0.1 | -1.1 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 0.8 |
| Net Income | -0.6 | 0.5 | 3.9 | 8.6 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 4.3 | 2.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on SENEA: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.