Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional accumulation: ownership increased +11.66% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ownership trend chart requires at least 2 quarters of data.
More quarterly data is being processed.
Top 14 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$11M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 8 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: -109%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 8 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~562.3% on $2M of debt.
Cash of $14M fully covers short-term debt of $2M.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.3M 100.0% | $16.2M 100.0% | $25.1M 100.0% | $19.7M 100.0% | $11.7M 100.0% | $2.1M 100.0% | $1.1M 100.0% | $1.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $6.7M 59.5% | $10.1M 62.3% | $15.3M 61.0% | $11.2M 56.7% | $6.5M 56.1% | $856K 41.5% | $513K 47.3% | $684K 65.4% |
| Gross Profit | $4.6M 40.5% | $6.1M 37.7% | $9.8M 39.0% | $8.5M 43.3% | $5.1M 43.9% | $1.2M 58.5% | $571K 52.7% | $362K 34.6% |
| Research & Development | $2.9M 25.7% | $4.4M 27.5% | $9.5M 37.9% | $15.9M 80.7% | $11.1M 95.1% | $6.8M 330.5% | $4.9M 453.4% | $4.2M 399.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $7.2M 63.6% | $8.7M 54.0% | $10.3M 40.9% | $12.1M 61.5% | $9.4M 80.8% | $7.6M 370.2% | $11.9M 1101.3% | $8.0M 766.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $17.6M 155.6% | $22.9M 141.2% | $42.6M 169.9% | $93.5M 475.0% | $30.2M 258.8% | $20.0M 966.6% | $21.3M 1968.7% | $16.5M 1579.5% |
| Operating Income | -$13.1M -115.1% | -$16.8M -103.5% | -$32.8M -130.9% | -$85.0M -431.8% | -$25.1M -214.9% | -$18.7M -908.1% | -$20.8M -1916.1% | -$16.2M -1544.9% |
| Interest Expense | $8.4M 74.4% | $559K 3.5% | $50K 0.2% | $679K 3.5% | $5K 0.0% | $8K 0.4% | $9.9M 916.8% | $4.5M 427.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$7.7M -67.7% | $280K 1.7% | $2.2M 8.7% | -$696K -3.5% | $1.2M 10.5% | $11K 0.5% | -$9.9M -914.1% | -$4.5M -427.1% |
| Pretax Income | -$20.7M -182.7% | -$16.5M -101.8% | -$30.6M -122.2% | -$85.7M -435.3% | -$23.9M -204.4% | -$18.7M -907.6% | — | — |
| Income Tax Expense | -$9K -0.1% | $161K 1.0% | -$313K -1.2% | -$205K -1.0% | -$3.1M -26.7% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% |
| Net Income | -$20.7M -182.7% | -$16.6M -102.8% | -$30.3M -120.9% | -$85.5M -434.3% | -$20.7M -177.8% | -$18.7M -907.6% | -$30.7M -2830.2% | -$20.6M -1972.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-40.43 | $-1123.63 | $-13.67 | $-45.95 | $-0.69 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 493K | 19K | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 7-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 7-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 65.4 | 47.3 | 41.5 | 56.1 | 56.7 | 61.0 | 62.3 | 59.5 |
| Gross Profit | 34.6 | 52.7 | 58.5 | 43.9 | 43.3 | 39.0 | 37.7 | 40.5 |
| R&D | 399.9 | 453.4 | 330.5 | 95.1 | 80.7 | 37.9 | 27.5 | 25.7 |
| SG&A | 766.7 | 1101.3 | 370.2 | 80.8 | 61.5 | 40.9 | 54.0 | 63.6 |
| Operating Income | -1544.9 | -1916.1 | -908.1 | -214.9 | -431.8 | -130.9 | -103.5 | -115.1 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -26.7 | -1.0 | -1.2 | 1.0 | -0.1 |
| Net Income | -1972.0 | -2830.2 | -907.6 | -177.8 | -434.3 | -120.9 | -102.8 | -182.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on SLE: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 192 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG | $4.15T | 31.8× | 27.8× | 10.3× | 15.1% | 59.7% | 32.8% | 31.8% | 28.5% | 0.3× | 4,874 |
| META | $1.72T | 29.1× | 17.1× | 8.6× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| AMX | $1.40T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 318 |
| CHT | $354.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $318.0B | 29.8× | 23.7× | 7.0× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $239.2B | 12.0× | 6.4× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $204.2B | 11.9× | 4.2× | 1.5× | 2.5% | — | 12.4% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 0.0× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $200.2B | 15.4× | 10.3× | 2.1× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.2% | 1.8× | 2,883 |
| TMUS | $184.2B | 17.1× | 8.3× | 2.1× | 8.5% | — | 12.4% | 18.6% | 7.6% | 2.7× | 1,648 |
| T | $182.0B | 8.3× | 6.8× | 1.4× | 2.7% | — | 17.5% | 17.4% | 8.1% | 3.2× | 2,848 |
| VEON | $127.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| DASH | $83.1B | 91.3× | 53.5× | 6.1× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| WBD | $70.0B | 97.4× | 15.3× | 1.9× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 36.1× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| LYV | $39.6B | — | 25.1× | 1.6× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| TTWO | $39.0B | — | 424.4× | 5.9× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| TWLO | $37.5B | 1172.6× | 107.1× | 7.4× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.5B | 58.3× | 60.1× | 12.9× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| FOX | $26.9B | 11.9× | — | 1.6× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| OMC | $24.6B | — | 57.5× | 1.4× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| ROKU | $22.8B | 261.1× | 530.2× | 4.8× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| FWONA | $21.5B | — | 39.5× | 4.8× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 283 |
| NWS | $18.9B | 16.1× | — | 2.2× | 2.4% | — | 14.0% | 13.4% | 11.0% | — | 304 |
| CHTR | $18.0B | 3.7× | 5.3× | 0.3× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| TKO | $15.3B | 83.8× | 13.8× | 3.2× | -3.1% | — | 4.1% | 5.2% | 2.6% | 2.9× | 616 |
| SLE | $7M | — | — | 0.6× | -29.9% | 40.5% | -183% | -118% | -109% | -0.1× | 14 |
Peers = companies sharing SLE's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.