Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 215 of 5,944 reporting institutions (92th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $6.32 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 13.9%/yr for a decade (off $57M normalized FCF).
The market's 13.9% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.15B shares · net debt $864M
mean 29.9% · volatility σ 133% · implied rate exceeded in 4/8 yrs
Central path = implied 13.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (133%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 192 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG | $4.15T | 31.8× | 27.8× | 10.3× | 15.1% | 59.7% | 32.8% | 31.8% | 28.5% | 0.3× | 4,874 |
| META | $1.72T | 29.1× | 17.1× | 8.6× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| AMX | $1.40T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 318 |
| CHT | $354.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $318.0B | 29.8× | 23.7× | 7.0× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $239.2B | 12.0× | 6.4× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $204.2B | 11.9× | 4.2× | 1.5× | 2.5% | — | 12.4% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 0.0× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $200.2B | 15.4× | 10.3× | 2.1× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.2% | 1.8× | 2,883 |
| TMUS | $184.2B | 17.1× | 8.3× | 2.1× | 8.5% | — | 12.4% | 18.6% | 7.6% | 2.7× | 1,648 |
| T | $182.0B | 8.3× | 6.8× | 1.4× | 2.7% | — | 17.5% | 17.4% | 8.1% | 3.2× | 2,848 |
| VEON | $127.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| DASH | $83.1B | 91.3× | 53.5× | 6.1× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| WBD | $70.0B | 97.4× | 15.3× | 1.9× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 36.1× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| LYV | $39.6B | — | 25.1× | 1.6× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| TTWO | $39.0B | — | 424.4× | 5.9× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| TWLO | $37.5B | 1172.6× | 107.1× | 7.4× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.5B | 58.3× | 60.1× | 12.9× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| FOX | $26.9B | 11.9× | — | 1.6× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| OMC | $24.6B | — | 57.5× | 1.4× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| ROKU | $22.8B | 261.1× | 530.2× | 4.8× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| FWONA | $21.5B | — | 39.5× | 4.8× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 283 |
| NWS | $18.9B | 16.1× | — | 2.2× | 2.4% | — | 14.0% | 13.4% | 11.0% | — | 304 |
| CHTR | $18.0B | 3.7× | 5.3× | 0.3× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| TKO | $15.3B | 83.8× | 13.8× | 3.2× | -3.1% | — | 4.1% | 5.2% | 2.6% | 2.9× | 616 |
| TDAY | $930M | 632.0× | — | 0.4× | -8.3% | 38.7% | 0.1% | 1.1% | 0.2% | — | 215 |
Peers = companies sharing TDAY's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.30B 100.0% | $2.51B 100.0% | $2.66B 100.0% | $2.95B 100.0% | $3.21B 100.0% | $3.41B 100.0% | $1.87B 100.0% | $1.53B 100.0% | $1.34B 100.0% | $1.26B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.41B 61.3% | $1.55B 61.6% | $1.69B 63.5% | $1.86B 63.2% | $1.90B 59.3% | $2.03B 59.7% | $1.08B 57.8% | $865.2M 56.7% | $742.8M 55.4% | — |
| Selling, General & Admin | $639.7M 27.8% | $703.6M 28.0% | $722.9M 27.1% | $852.5M 28.9% | $902.1M 28.1% | $999.8M 29.4% | $602.1M 32.2% | $502.6M 32.9% | $447.1M 33.3% | $415.8M 33.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | — | $2.55B 101.7% | $2.58B 96.8% | $2.98B 101.1% | $3.10B 96.6% | $3.85B 113.2% | $2.01B 107.9% | $1.47B 96.2% | $1.31B 97.5% | — |
| Operating Income | — | -$42.8M -1.7% | $86.3M 3.2% | -$33.6M -1.1% | $109.1M 3.4% | -$447.9M -13.2% | -$147.0M -7.9% | $58.1M 3.8% | $33.8M 2.5% | $60.6M 4.8% |
| Interest Expense | $97.2M 4.2% | $104.7M 4.2% | $111.8M 4.2% | $108.4M 3.7% | $135.7M 4.2% | $228.5M 6.7% | $63.7M 3.4% | $36.1M 2.4% | $30.5M 2.3% | $29.6M 2.4% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $26.3M 1.1% | -$34.8M -1.4% | -$92.4M -3.5% | -$43.3M -1.5% | -$197.0M -6.1% | -$258.0M -7.6% | -$60.2M -3.2% | -$38.1M -2.5% | -$34.3M -2.6% | -$1.6M -0.1% |
| Pretax Income | -$1.3M -0.1% | -$77.7M -3.1% | -$6.2M -0.2% | -$76.9M -2.6% | -$87.9M -2.7% | -$705.8M -20.7% | -$207.2M -11.1% | $20.0M 1.3% | -$434K -0.0% | — |
| Income Tax Expense | -$3.0M -0.1% | -$51.3M -2.0% | $21.7M 0.8% | $1.3M 0.0% | $48.3M 1.5% | -$33.5M -1.0% | -$86.0M -4.6% | $1.9M 0.1% | $481K 0.0% | -$2.3M -0.2% |
| Net Income | $1.7M 0.1% | -$26.4M -1.1% | -$27.8M -1.0% | -$78.0M -2.6% | -$135.0M -4.2% | -$670.5M -19.7% | -$119.8M -6.4% | $18.2M 1.2% | -$915K -0.1% | $31.6M 2.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.01 | $-0.18 | $-0.20 | $-0.57 | $-1.00 | $-5.09 | $-1.77 | $0.31 | $-0.02 | $0.70 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.01 | $-0.18 | $-0.20 | $-0.57 | $-1.00 | $-5.09 | $-1.77 | $0.31 | $-0.02 | $0.70 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 145.1M | 142.5M | 139.6M | 136.9M | 134.8M | 131.7M | 67.7M | 58.0M | 53.0M | 45.2M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 146.0M | 142.5M | 139.6M | 136.9M | 134.8M | 131.7M | 67.7M | 58.4M | 53.0M | 45.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $3M buybacks = $3M returned on $63M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 0%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $90M is below the $128M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2020-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~10.2% on $954M of debt.
Cash of $90M fully covers short-term debt of $69M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 8-yr range · 88th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 8-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 56.7 | 57.8 | 59.7 | 59.3 | 63.2 | 63.5 | 61.6 | 61.3 |
| SG&A | 32.9 | 32.2 | 29.4 | 28.1 | 28.9 | 27.1 | 28.0 | 27.8 |
| Operating Income | 3.8 | -7.9 | -13.2 | 3.4 | -1.1 | 3.2 | -1.7 | — |
| Income Tax | 0.1 | -4.6 | -1.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.8 | -2.0 | -0.1 |
| Net Income | 1.2 | -6.4 | -19.7 | -4.2 | -2.6 | -1.0 | -1.1 | 0.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TDAY: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.