Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 346 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
No trend data available for this metric.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $87.83 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 7.4%/yr for a decade (off $227M normalized FCF).
The market's 7.4% is more conservative than its 4-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.05B shares · net debt $76M
mean 196.8% · volatility σ 111% · implied rate exceeded in 4/4 yrs
Central path = implied 7.4%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (111%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
7/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $90M buybacks = $90M returned on $353M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 17%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $579M covers the $6M due within a year 99.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~10.1% on $655M of debt.
Cash of $579M fully covers short-term debt of $6M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.35B 100.0% | $1.35B 100.0% | $1.01B 100.0% | $647.7M 100.0% | $371.0M 100.0% | $397.0M 100.0% | $486.5M 100.0% | $406.5M 100.0% | $601.6M 100.0% | $979.1M 100.0% |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | — | -$29.7M -7.5% | $6.9M 1.4% | $6.1M 1.5% | -$59.4M -9.9% | $69.6M 7.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $134.5M 9.9% | $110.8M 8.2% | $95.3M 9.4% | $101.9M 15.7% | $68.5M 18.5% | $73.4M 18.5% | $103.7M 21.3% | $110.0M 27.1% | $145.9M 24.2% | $153.8M 15.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.07B 79.1% | $1.03B 76.9% | $827.8M 82.0% | $621.0M 95.9% | $466.0M 125.6% | $583.8M 147.0% | $573.2M 117.8% | $514.0M 126.4% | $1.18B 196.1% | $1.05B 107.1% |
| Operating Income | $282.6M 20.9% | $311.3M 23.1% | $182.2M 18.0% | $26.7M 4.1% | -$95.0M -25.6% | -$186.8M -47.0% | -$86.6M -17.8% | -$107.5M -26.4% | -$577.9M -96.1% | -$69.5M -7.1% |
| Interest Expense | $66.1M 4.9% | $73.2M 5.4% | $48.7M 4.8% | $17.4M 2.7% | $15.6M 4.2% | $24.2M 6.1% | $29.1M 6.0% | $30.4M 7.5% | $75.0M 12.5% | $53.8M 5.5% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$62.4M -4.6% | -$81.9M -6.1% | -$43.3M -4.3% | -$29.0M -4.5% | -$28.8M -7.8% | -$10.9M -2.7% | -$26.9M -5.5% | -$46.0M -11.3% | -$65.8M -10.9% | -$70.0M -7.2% |
| Pretax Income | $220.2M 16.3% | $229.5M 17.1% | $138.9M 13.8% | -$2.3M -0.4% | -$123.8M -33.4% | -$197.7M -49.8% | -$113.5M -23.3% | -$153.5M -37.8% | -$643.6M -107.0% | -$139.6M -14.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$113.2M -8.4% | $50.2M 3.7% | $43.3M 4.3% | $19.9M 3.1% | $5.9M 1.6% | -$965K -0.2% | $27.7M 5.7% | $18.3M 4.5% | $6.4M 1.1% | $20.8M 2.1% |
| Net Income | $333.5M 24.7% | $179.0M 13.3% | $95.6M 9.5% | -$22.0M -3.4% | -$129.0M -34.8% | -$196.2M -49.4% | -$141.7M -29.1% | -$171.5M -42.2% | -$660.1M -109.7% | -$160.2M -16.4% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $6.69 | $3.44 | $1.88 | $-0.49 | $-3.14 | $-4.86 | $-3.71 | $-6.45 | $-14.02 | $-3.41 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $6.64 | $3.40 | $1.84 | $-0.49 | $-3.14 | $-4.86 | $-3.71 | $-6.45 | $-14.02 | $-3.41 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 50.1M | 52.5M | 51.6M | 44.1M | 41K | 40K | 38.2M | 26.6M | 47.1M | 47.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 50.4M | 53.1M | 52.9M | 44.1M | 41K | 40K | 38.2M | 26.6M | 47.1M | 47.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $682.3B | 24.4× | — | 2.0× | -5.0% | — | 8.7% | 11.1% | 10.7% | — | 4,568 |
| SHEL | $545.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,521 |
| CVX | $391.2B | 31.9× | — | 2.1× | -6.8% | 42.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 6.6% | — | 4,121 |
| TTE | $202.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 951 |
| COP | $166.8B | 21.0× | — | 2.8× | 7.7% | 62.1% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 12.2% | — | 2,450 |
| PBR | $155.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 524 |
| MPC | $128.7B | 31.9× | 11.0× | 1.0× | -4.4% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 23.4% | 20.6% | 0.2× | 1,802 |
| VLO | $127.5B | 54.5× | 24.1× | 1.0× | -5.5% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.7× | 1,781 |
| BP | $117.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,220 |
| PSX | $111.3B | 25.4× | — | 0.8× | -7.5% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 15.1% | 14.6% | — | 2,041 |
| EQNR | $110.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 398 |
| WMB | $87.7B | 33.6× | 17.8× | 7.3× | 13.8% | — | 21.9% | 20.4% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,736 |
| EPD | $84.1B | — | 12.6× | 1.6× | -6.4% | 26.7% | 11.0% | — | — | 3.7× | 1,573 |
| EOG | $79.0B | 15.9× | 7.7× | 3.5× | -4.5% | — | 22.0% | 16.7% | 13.2% | 0.7× | 1,525 |
| SLB | $77.9B | 22.2× | — | 2.2× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 1,624 |
| ET | $72.5B | — | 9.8× | 0.8× | 3.5% | 25.8% | 5.2% | 9.0% | 3.8% | 4.8× | 1,244 |
| KMI | $69.7B | 22.9× | 14.2× | 4.1× | 12.2% | — | 18.0% | 9.8% | 4.8% | 4.5× | 1,745 |
| TRGP | $61.2B | 33.6× | 16.2× | 3.6× | 3.9% | 38.3% | 11.3% | 62.7% | 9.4% | 3.6× | 979 |
| TS | $60.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 248 |
| MPLX | $59.4B | — | — | 4.6× | 8.9% | — | 38.1% | — | — | — | 622 |
| LNG | $59.3B | 11.2× | 7.8× | 3.0× | 27.2% | — | 26.7% | 67.3% | 17.3% | 2.2× | 1,303 |
| OKE | $58.7B | 17.2× | 12.4× | 1.8× | 55.0% | 30.5% | 10.1% | 15.1% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,622 |
| OXY | $58.5B | 36.8× | — | 2.7× | -1.9% | — | 11.0% | 6.6% | 4.2% | — | 1,250 |
| BKR | $56.2B | — | — | 2.0× | -0.3% | — | 9.3% | 13.7% | 13.3% | — | 1,095 |
| FANG | $56.0B | 34.4× | 11.2× | 3.7× | 35.8% | — | 11.1% | 4.5% | 3.2% | 2.3× | 1,141 |
| TDW | $4.4B | 13.2× | 10.2× | 3.2× | 0.5% | — | 24.7% | 24.5% | 16.6% | 1.5× | 346 |
Peers = companies sharing TDW's sector (Energy) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 45th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit | 1.5 | 1.4 | -7.5 | — | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | 27.1 | 21.3 | 18.5 | 18.5 | 15.7 | 9.4 | 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Operating Income | -26.4 | -17.8 | -47.0 | -25.6 | 4.1 | 18.0 | 23.1 | 20.9 |
| Income Tax | 4.5 | 5.7 | -0.2 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 4.3 | 3.7 | -8.4 |
| Net Income | -42.2 | -29.1 | -49.4 | -34.8 | -3.4 | 9.5 | 13.3 | 24.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TDW: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.