Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 551 of 5,944 reporting institutions (97th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $293.31 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 20.3%/yr for a decade (off $389M normalized FCF).
The market's 20.3% is more conservative than its 4-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.05B shares · net debt $6.1B
mean 243.1% · volatility σ 352% · implied rate exceeded in 2/3 yrs
Central path = implied 20.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (352%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
3/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $103M buybacks = $103M returned on $606M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 6 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: -3%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 6 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $689M covers the $29M due within a year 23.8× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~4.4% on $6.8B of debt.
Cash of $689M fully covers short-term debt of $29M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2022 | FY2015 | FY2014 | FY2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.58B 100.0% | $2.12B 100.0% | $3.09B 100.0% | — | — | — |
| Selling, General & Admin | $624.0M 24.2% | $163.0M 7.7% | $106.0M 3.4% | — | — | — |
| Operating Income | -$90.0M -3.5% | $226.0M 10.7% | $241.0M 7.8% | -$39.0M | $397.0M | -$293.0M |
| Interest Expense | $302.0M 11.7% | $238.0M 11.3% | $359.0M 11.6% | $211.0M | $124.0M | $159.0M |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $10.0M 0.4% | $61.0M 2.9% | -$44.0M -1.4% | -$118.0M | $30.0M | $32.0M |
| Pretax Income | -$166.0M -6.4% | $1.11B 52.5% | -$1.33B -43.0% | -$368.0M | $303.0M | -$420.0M |
| Income Tax Expense | $53.0M 2.1% | $98.0M 4.6% | -$35.0M -1.1% | -$27.0M | $116.0M | -$159.0M |
| Net Income | -$219.0M -8.5% | $998.0M 47.2% | -$1.29B -41.9% | -$341.0M | $410.0M | -$230.0M |
| Per Share | ||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-4.79 | $18.40 | — | $-3.10 | $4.91 | $-2.75 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-4.79 | $17.67 | — | $-3.10 | $4.91 | $-2.75 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 45.7M | 54.3M | 0 | 109.9M | 83.5M | 83.5M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 45.7M | 56.5M | 0 | 109.9M | 83.5M | 83.5M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Nothing notable to watch.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2013 | FY2014 | FY2015 | FY2022 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | — | — | — | 3.4 | 7.7 | 24.2 |
| Operating Income | — | — | — | 7.8 | 10.7 | -3.5 |
| Income Tax | — | — | — | -1.1 | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Net Income | — | — | — | -41.9 | 47.2 | -8.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TLN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 95 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEV | $249.3B | 52.3× | 124.5× | 6.5× | 9.0% | 19.8% | 12.8% | 43.7% | 43.4% | 0.0× | 2,989 |
| NEE | $167.4B | 24.4× | — | 6.5× | 9.8% | — | 26.5% | 12.5% | 4.6% | — | 2,911 |
| SO | $95.1B | 22.0× | — | 3.2× | 10.6% | — | 14.7% | 12.1% | 11.8% | — | 2,268 |
| DUK | $91.6B | 18.7× | 10.7× | 2.9× | 5.6% | — | 15.7% | 9.6% | 3.7% | 5.1× | 2,360 |
| CEG | $81.0B | 35.1× | 21.3× | 3.2× | 8.3% | — | 9.1% | 16.0% | 9.9% | 2.2× | 1,836 |
| AEP | $65.3B | 18.1× | 12.8× | 3.0× | 10.9% | — | 16.9% | 11.9% | 4.8% | 5.3× | 1,854 |
| D | $55.8B | 18.4× | — | 3.4× | 14.2% | — | 18.2% | 10.3% | 3.8% | — | 1,421 |
| SRE | $53.3B | 29.7× | — | 3.9× | 3.9% | — | 13.4% | 5.8% | 5.1% | — | 1,217 |
| VST | $47.5B | 64.4× | 16.8× | 2.7× | 3.0% | — | 5.3% | 18.5% | 3.9% | 4.8× | 1,246 |
| XEL | $45.3B | 21.3× | — | — | — | — | — | 8.5% | 3.5% | — | 1,208 |
| ETR | $45.2B | 26.2× | 13.1× | 3.5× | 9.0% | — | 13.7% | 10.5% | 3.9% | 5.2× | 1,224 |
| EXC | $43.4B | — | 11.1× | 1.8× | 5.3% | — | 11.4% | 9.6% | 3.6% | 5.9× | 1,230 |
| ED | $38.1B | 18.7× | — | 2.3× | 10.9% | — | 12.0% | 8.4% | 4.0% | — | 1,368 |
| PEG | $35.1B | 16.7× | — | 2.9× | 18.3% | — | 17.3% | 12.4% | 5.3% | — | 1,231 |
| WEC | $33.6B | 21.5× | 14.5× | 3.4× | 14.0% | 66.7% | 15.9% | 11.1% | 4.5% | 5.5× | 1,310 |
| AEE | $28.5B | 19.3× | — | 3.2× | 15.4% | — | 16.6% | 10.9% | 4.5% | — | 884 |
| AWK | $26.9B | 24.2× | 10.2× | 5.3× | 10.1% | — | 21.7% | 10.3% | 8.9% | 0.6× | 1,100 |
| FE | $26.2B | 25.8× | 6.8× | 1.7× | 12.0% | — | 6.8% | 8.2% | 7.9% | 0.1× | 894 |
| ATO | $26.2B | 21.7× | 11.3× | 5.6× | 12.9% | — | 25.5% | 8.8% | 8.8% | — | 961 |
| ES | $25.5B | 14.9× | 9.9× | 1.9× | 13.8% | — | 12.5% | 10.5% | 3.8% | 5.2× | 1,012 |
| PPL | $25.1B | 21.0× | 12.3× | 2.8× | 6.9% | — | 13.1% | 7.9% | 3.5% | 5.4× | 947 |
| CNP | $25.0B | 24.0× | 12.7× | 2.7× | 8.3% | 100.0% | 11.2% | 9.4% | 3.3% | 5.8× | 774 |
| EIX | $21.1B | 4.8× | 5.8× | 1.1× | 9.8% | — | 23.1% | 25.4% | 8.0% | 3.7× | 1,005 |
| NRG | $20.4B | 26.8× | 9.9× | 0.7× | 9.2% | — | 2.8% | 51.4% | 4.8% | 5.1× | 1,010 |
| CMS | $20.2B | 18.7× | 12.7× | 2.4× | 13.6% | — | 12.5% | 11.7% | 3.8% | 6.2× | 762 |
| TLN | $13.1B | — | 101.9× | 5.1× | 22.0% | — | -8.5% | -20.0% | -2.8% | 36.0× | 551 |
Peers = companies sharing TLN's sector (Utilities) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.