Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 399 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 651 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $29.49T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $371.6B | 42.5× | 29.7× | 5.5× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $328.8B | 38.5× | — | 7.2× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $259.8B | 39.0× | 18.5× | 2.9× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| BA | $199.4B | 79.4× | 40.2× | 2.2× | 34.5% | 4.8% | 2.5% | 41.0% | 3.3% | 10.0× | 2,435 |
| DE | $185.4B | 37.1× | — | 4.1× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| ABBNY | $177.4B | 47.9× | 31.6× | 5.5× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $167.6B | 23.6× | 16.1× | 6.8× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $158.8B | 39.2× | — | 5.8× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| HON | $131.2B | 28.1× | 16.1× | 3.5× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| LMT | $123.2B | 25.0× | 16.1× | 1.6× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 17.7% | 2.5× | 2,807 |
| PH | $118.7B | 34.1× | 26.8× | 6.0× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| ADP | $108.3B | 24.9× | — | 4.9× | 6.7% | 46.4% | 20.1% | 73.2% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| GD | $96.2B | 23.0× | 16.9× | 1.8× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| TT | $94.4B | 32.6× | 23.3× | 4.4× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| VRT | $92.4B | 70.8× | 43.8× | 9.0× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.4% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| PWR | $92.2B | 90.7× | 45.8× | 3.2× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.6% | 11.5% | 10.6% | 0.4× | 1,659 |
| JCI | $91.9B | 28.0× | — | 3.9× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| HWM | $90.7B | 60.9× | 39.9× | 11.0× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 17.9% | 1.3× | 1,399 |
| CSX | $89.1B | 31.1× | 14.4× | 6.3× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| MMM | $87.3B | 27.4× | 16.8× | 3.5× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| WM | $86.0B | 31.8× | 12.1× | 3.4× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| UPS | $85.0B | 15.3× | 9.5× | 1.0× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| EMR | $83.0B | 36.5× | — | 4.6× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| CTAS | $79.8B | 45.0× | 28.7× | 7.7× | 7.7% | 50.0% | 17.5% | 38.7% | 25.5% | 0.8× | 1,366 |
| TREX | $4.6B | 24.4× | 14.3× | 3.9× | 2.0% | 39.2% | 16.2% | 18.4% | 18.4% | — | 399 |
Peers = companies sharing TREX's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $42.69 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 10.9%/yr for a decade (off $179M normalized FCF).
The market's 10.9% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.11B shares · net debt -$4M
mean 98.2% · volatility σ 268% · implied rate exceeded in 4/8 yrs
Central path = implied 10.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (268%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $54M buybacks = $54M returned on $135M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 18%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Interest last disclosed in FY2017 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 50th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 56.9 | 58.9 | 59.2 | 61.5 | 63.5 | 58.8 | 56.4 | 60.8 |
| Gross Profit | 43.1 | 41.1 | 40.8 | 38.5 | 36.5 | 41.2 | 43.6 | 39.2 |
| R&D | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| SG&A | 17.3 | 15.9 | 14.3 | 11.7 | 12.8 | 16.1 | 15.6 | 17.2 |
| Operating Income | 25.8 | 25.2 | 26.5 | 23.0 | 22.3 | 25.1 | 28.0 | 22.0 |
| Income Tax | 6.2 | 6.0 | 6.7 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 6.4 | 7.2 | 5.8 |
| Net Income | 19.7 | 19.4 | 19.9 | 17.4 | 16.7 | 18.6 | 20.7 | 16.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TREX: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.17B 100.0% | $1.15B 100.0% | $1.09B 100.0% | $1.11B 100.0% | $1.20B 100.0% | $880.8M 100.0% | $745.3M 100.0% | $684.3M 100.0% | $565.2M 100.0% | $479.6M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $714.3M 60.8% | $649.6M 56.4% | $644.0M 58.8% | $702.1M 63.5% | $736.4M 61.5% | $521.4M 59.2% | $438.8M 58.9% | $389.4M 56.9% | $321.8M 56.9% | $292.5M 61.0% |
| Gross Profit | $460.0M 39.2% | $501.9M 43.6% | $450.8M 41.2% | $404.0M 36.5% | $460.5M 38.5% | $359.5M 40.8% | $306.5M 41.1% | $294.9M 43.1% | $243.4M 43.1% | $187.1M 39.0% |
| Research & Development | $4.2M 0.4% | $3.5M 0.3% | $3.3M 0.3% | $500K 0.0% | $6.0M 0.5% | $3.4M 0.4% | $3.4M 0.5% | $4.5M 0.7% | $3.8M 0.7% | $3.7M 0.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $202.0M 17.2% | $180.0M 15.6% | $176.2M 16.1% | $141.8M 12.8% | $139.6M 11.7% | $125.8M 14.3% | $118.3M 15.9% | $118.2M 17.3% | $101.0M 17.9% | $83.1M 17.3% |
| Operating Income | $258.0M 22.0% | $321.9M 28.0% | $274.6M 25.1% | $246.7M 22.3% | $275.4M 23.0% | $233.6M 26.5% | $188.2M 25.2% | $176.7M 25.8% | $142.4M 25.2% | $104.0M 21.7% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $461K 0.1% | $1.1M 0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $258.0M 22.0% | $321.9M 28.0% | $274.6M 25.1% | $246.8M 22.3% | $275.4M 23.0% | $234.6M 26.6% | $189.7M 25.5% | $176.9M 25.8% | $141.9M 25.1% | $102.8M 21.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $67.5M 5.8% | $83.5M 7.2% | $70.5M 6.4% | $62.2M 5.6% | $66.7M 5.6% | $59.0M 6.7% | $45.0M 6.0% | $42.3M 6.2% | $46.8M 8.3% | $35.0M 7.3% |
| Net Income | $190.4M 16.2% | $238.4M 20.7% | $204.1M 18.6% | $184.6M 16.7% | $208.7M 17.4% | $175.6M 19.9% | $144.7M 19.4% | $134.6M 19.7% | $95.1M 16.8% | $67.8M 14.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.78 | $2.20 | $1.88 | $1.65 | $1.81 | $1.52 | $1.24 | $1.15 | $1.62 | $1.16 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.78 | $2.20 | $1.88 | $1.65 | $1.80 | $1.51 | $1.24 | $1.14 | $1.61 | $1.15 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 107.0M | 108.2M | 108.7M | 111.7M | 115.5M | 115.9M | 116.9M | 117.5M | 58.8M | 58.8M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 107.1M | 108.3M | 108.8M | 111.9M | 115.8M | 116.3M | 117.3M | 118.1M | 59.2M | 59.2M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.