Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 347 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 8%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $25M is below the $50M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~3.5% on $943M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 240 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WELL | $159.4B | 164.7× | — | 14.7× | 35.6% | 40.1% | 8.9% | 2.3% | 1.6% | — | 1,425 |
| PLD | $125.3B | 37.9× | — | 14.3× | 7.2% | — | 37.9% | 6.3% | 3.8% | — | 1,592 |
| XHG | $124.6B | — | — | 2429.0× | 24.9% | 2.2% | -205% | 85.0% | 88.3% | — | 1 |
| EQIX | $100.3B | 74.2× | 25.6× | 10.9× | 5.4% | 51.1% | 14.6% | 9.5% | 8.7% | 0.3× | 1,229 |
| AMT | $81.1B | 32.2× | 14.0× | 7.6× | 5.1% | — | 24.7% | 72.0% | 37.3% | 0.6× | 1,662 |
| SPG | $67.0B | 14.5× | — | 10.5× | 6.7% | — | 84.3% | 103% | 15.9% | — | 1,242 |
| O | $52.9B | 48.4× | — | 9.2× | 9.1% | — | 18.4% | 2.7% | 2.7% | — | 1,389 |
| PSA | $52.0B | 32.9× | — | 10.8× | 2.7% | — | 37.0% | 19.3% | 9.1% | — | 1,045 |
| CBRE | $41.3B | 36.2× | — | 1.0× | 13.4% | 18.7% | 2.9% | 13.0% | 7.1% | — | 1,020 |
| VTR | $41.2B | 160.5× | — | 7.1× | 18.5% | — | 4.5% | 2.1% | 1.0% | — | 891 |
| IRM | $33.8B | 233.3× | 22.9× | 4.9× | 12.2% | — | 2.2% | -15.5% | 1.0% | 7.5× | 1,043 |
| EXR | $28.9B | 29.8× | 13.5× | 8.6× | 3.7% | 72.8% | 28.8% | 7.3% | 7.3% | — | 722 |
| AVB | $26.6B | 25.6× | 12.2× | 8.7× | 4.4% | — | 34.7% | 9.1% | 5.0% | 3.2× | 715 |
| EQR | $25.6B | 23.0× | — | — | — | — | — | 10.1% | 5.8% | — | 681 |
| VICI | $25.4B | 9.1× | — | 6.3× | 4.1% | 99.3% | 69.3% | 10.0% | 6.2% | — | 898 |
| SBAC | $18.9B | 18.2× | 21.4× | 6.7× | 5.1% | 75.5% | 37.4% | -21.7% | 13.1% | 8.7× | 636 |
| BEKE | $17.9B | 135.7× | 38.6× | 1.3× | 5.6% | 21.4% | 3.2% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 197 |
| ESS | $17.4B | 26.0× | 11.5× | 9.2× | 6.4% | 69.9% | 37.2% | 12.7% | 12.7% | — | 582 |
| INVH | $16.4B | 28.0× | — | 6.0× | 4.2% | — | 21.5% | 6.2% | 3.3% | — | 560 |
| JLL | $15.8B | 20.5× | 11.8× | 0.6× | 11.4% | — | 3.0% | 10.6% | 10.4% | 0.1× | 615 |
| WY | $15.3B | 47.2× | 16.4× | 2.2× | -3.1% | 14.8% | 4.7% | 3.4% | 2.2% | 4.5× | 868 |
| KIM | $15.2B | — | 16.2× | 7.1× | 5.1% | — | 27.3% | 5.6% | 3.2% | 5.5× | 633 |
| HST | $15.0B | 19.9× | — | 2.5× | 7.6% | — | 12.5% | 11.7% | 9.8% | — | 656 |
| LAMR | $14.9B | 25.4× | — | 6.6× | 2.7% | 67.0% | 25.9% | 57.3% | 13.2% | — | 655 |
| NLY | $14.9B | 7.2× | — | — | — | — | — | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 743 |
| TRNO | $6.8B | 16.8× | — | 14.3× | 24.5% | — | 84.6% | 9.7% | 7.9% | — | 347 |
Peers = companies sharing TRNO's sector (Real Estate) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $65.75 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 18.6%/yr for a decade (off $174M normalized FCF).
The market's 18.6% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.10B shares · net debt $918M
mean 31.0% · volatility σ 30% · implied rate exceeded in 4/9 yrs
Central path = implied 18.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (30%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend takes 98% of free cash flow — sustainable but with limited headroom. Last year: $204M dividends + $3M buybacks = $207M returned on $208M FCF.
9 consecutive years of dividend increases · 12%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $476.4M 100.0% | $382.6M 100.0% | $323.6M 100.0% | $276.2M 100.0% | $221.9M 100.0% | $186.9M 100.0% | $171.0M 100.0% | $151.7M 100.0% | $132.5M 100.0% | $108.4M 100.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $47.3M 9.9% | $42.6M 11.1% | $37.9M 11.7% | $31.2M 11.3% | $27.0M 12.1% | $23.5M 12.6% | $23.9M 14.0% | $21.5M 14.2% | $19.7M 14.9% | $19.3M 17.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $284.3M 59.7% | $234.7M 61.3% | $190.5M 58.9% | $167.3M 60.6% | $134.1M 60.4% | $118.7M 63.5% | $112.2M 65.6% | $102.4M 67.5% | $93.4M 70.5% | $87.2M 80.4% |
| Interest Expense | $32.9M 6.9% | $20.9M 5.5% | $24.8M 7.7% | $23.9M 8.6% | $18.1M 8.1% | $16.0M 8.6% | $16.3M 9.6% | $18.2M 12.0% | $16.8M 12.7% | $13.1M 12.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $210.9M 44.3% | $36.5M 9.6% | $18.3M 5.7% | $89.1M 32.3% | -$605K -0.3% | $11.6M 6.2% | -$3.3M -1.9% | $14.1M 9.3% | $14.0M 10.6% | -$6.1M -5.7% |
| Net Income | $403.0M 84.6% | $184.5M 48.2% | $151.5M 46.8% | $198.0M 71.7% | $87.3M 39.3% | $79.8M 42.7% | $55.5M 32.5% | $63.3M 41.7% | $53.1M 40.1% | $15.1M 13.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $3.92 | $1.92 | $1.81 | $2.61 | $1.23 | $1.17 | $0.86 | $1.09 | $0.95 | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.91 | $1.92 | $1.81 | $2.61 | $1.23 | $1.16 | $0.85 | $1.09 | $0.95 | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 102.5M | 95.5M | 83.2M | 75.5M | 70.5M | 67.8M | 64.4M | 57.5M | 51.4M | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 102.7M | 95.8M | 83.4M | 75.6M | 70.8M | 68.2M | 64.7M | 57.5M | 51.4M | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 42th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 14.2 | 14.0 | 12.6 | 12.1 | 11.3 | 11.7 | 11.1 | 9.9 |
| Net Income | 41.7 | 32.5 | 42.7 | 39.3 | 71.7 | 46.8 | 48.2 | 84.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TRNO: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.