Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 360 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $219.24 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 40.1%/yr for a decade (off $122M normalized FCF).
2-stage DCF · 0.11B shares · net debt -$74M
mean -77.1% · volatility σ 181% · implied rate exceeded in 3/8 yrs
Central path = implied 40.1%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (181%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.57B 100.0% | $1.44B 100.0% | $1.42B 100.0% | $1.68B 100.0% | $1.51B 100.0% | $1.27B 100.0% | $1.23B 100.0% | $1.30B 100.0% | $1.39B 100.0% | $1.25B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.20B 76.8% | $1.10B 76.4% | $1.07B 75.2% | $1.21B 72.2% | $1.18B 78.2% | $1.03B 81.6% | $1.00B 81.4% | $1.01B 77.5% | $1.03B 74.5% | $946.5M 75.7% |
| Gross Profit | $363.9M 23.2% | $339.4M 23.6% | $353.5M 24.8% | $466.3M 27.8% | $329.1M 21.8% | $233.3M 18.4% | $229.7M 18.6% | $292.9M 22.5% | $354.3M 25.5% | $303.1M 24.3% |
| Research & Development | $86.5M 5.5% | $79.4M 5.5% | $79.8M 5.6% | $83.9M 5.0% | $85.4M 5.7% | $78.3M 6.2% | $75.6M 6.1% | $73.1M 5.6% | $67.7M 4.9% | $63.1M 5.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $83.2M 5.3% | $75.0M 5.2% | $72.5M 5.1% | $80.3M 4.8% | $77.2M 5.1% | $64.0M 5.1% | $67.4M 5.5% | $65.0M 5.0% | $66.8M 4.8% | $65.4M 5.2% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $169.7M 10.8% | $148.1M 10.3% | -$193.7M -13.6% | $154.6M 9.2% | $162.6M 10.8% | $142.3M 11.2% | $143.0M 11.6% | $138.0M 10.6% | $134.5M 9.7% | $127.9M 10.2% |
| Operating Income | $194.2M 12.4% | $191.3M 13.3% | $547.3M 38.5% | $311.7M 18.6% | $166.5M 11.0% | $91.0M 7.2% | $86.7M 7.0% | $154.9M 11.9% | $219.8M 15.8% | $175.2M 14.0% |
| Interest Expense | $3.7M 0.2% | $4.0M 0.3% | $4.4M 0.3% | $5.7M 0.3% | $7.3M 0.5% | $6.8M 0.5% | $6.8M 0.6% | $10.6M 0.8% | $12.6M 0.9% | $13.1M 1.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$10.5M -0.7% | -$24.7M -1.7% | $7.0M 0.5% | -$6.9M -0.4% | $1.5M 0.1% | -$5.2M -0.4% | $12K 0.0% | -$13.2M -1.0% | -$15.4M -1.1% | -$24.3M -1.9% |
| Pretax Income | $240.4M 15.3% | $217.4M 15.1% | $584.8M 41.1% | $292.0M 17.4% | $155.1M 10.3% | $88.7M 7.0% | $91.0M 7.4% | $139.3M 10.7% | $201.8M 14.5% | $210.6M 16.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $21.6M 1.4% | $10.2M 0.7% | $65.3M 4.6% | $25.5M 1.5% | $1.0M 0.1% | $5.4M 0.4% | $2.9M 0.2% | $5.9M 0.5% | -$99.9M -7.2% | $1.4M 0.1% |
| Net Income | $220.5M 14.1% | $207.9M 14.5% | $518.5M 36.4% | $264.6M 15.8% | $150.0M 9.9% | $82.3M 6.5% | $90.0M 7.3% | $135.6M 10.4% | $298.0M 21.5% | $203.9M 16.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.97 | $1.87 | $4.70 | $2.42 | $1.39 | $0.77 | $0.85 | $1.35 | $3.08 | $2.33 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.94 | $1.85 | $4.66 | $2.39 | $1.37 | $0.76 | $0.84 | $1.32 | $2.90 | $2.09 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 112.0M | 111.2M | 110.3M | 109.3M | 108.3M | 107.3M | 106.3M | 100.4M | 96.6M | 87.5M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 113.6M | 112.3M | 111.2M | 110.8M | 109.8M | 108.5M | 107.4M | 102.5M | 105.9M | 101.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$49M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 7%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $235M covers all $217M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2014-12-31 (20-F).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~2.3% on $162M of debt.
Cash of $235M fully covers short-term debt of $28M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 98th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 77.5 | 81.4 | 81.6 | 78.2 | 72.2 | 75.2 | 76.4 | 76.8 |
| Gross Profit | 22.5 | 18.6 | 18.4 | 21.8 | 27.8 | 24.8 | 23.6 | 23.2 |
| R&D | 5.6 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 5.7 | 5.0 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| SG&A | 5.0 | 5.5 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 4.8 | 5.1 | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Operating Income | 11.9 | 7.0 | 7.2 | 11.0 | 18.6 | 38.5 | 13.3 | 12.4 |
| Income Tax | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 4.6 | 0.7 | 1.4 |
| Net Income | 10.4 | 7.3 | 6.5 | 9.9 | 15.8 | 36.4 | 14.5 | 14.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TSEM: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.83T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.20T | 43.6× | 39.0× | 24.1× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.91T | 44.6× | 34.3× | 11.8× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.64T | 27.3× | 19.3× | 11.0× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.61T | 71.2× | 63.6× | 25.2× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 122.1× | 57.5× | 27.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $835.4B | 193.4× | 197.6× | 24.1× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $504.6B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $426.7B | 42.3× | 35.8× | 7.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $416.9B | 276.7× | 288.5× | 93.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $367.3B | 64.9× | 34.6× | 3.2× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.6B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $329.4B | 48.0× | 37.9× | 11.6× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $325.1B | — | — | 1051.3× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $283.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| SAP | $261.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ARM | $259.6B | 287.0× | 223.6× | 52.8× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| PANW | $250.9B | 234.8× | 156.8× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| ANET | $248.2B | 71.8× | 62.7× | 27.6× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| TXN | $236.9B | 47.8× | 31.2× | 13.4× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $232.8B | 32.1× | 25.2× | 5.6× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.5B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $221.9B | — | — | 30.2× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $198.5B | 36.9× | 14.9× | 4.5× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $194.6B | 74.8× | 127.2× | 23.8× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| TSEM | $22.8B | 104.2× | 45.6× | 14.5× | 9.1% | 23.2% | 14.1% | 7.6% | 7.2% | 0.3× | 360 |
Peers = companies sharing TSEM's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.