Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 223 of 5,944 reporting institutions (92th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $630.9M 100.0% | $599.1M 100.0% | $626.3M 100.0% | $553.2M 100.0% | $388.3M 100.0% | $377.7M 100.0% | $561.2M 100.0% | $560.1M 100.0% | $723.1M 100.0% | $617.4M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $433.7M 68.7% | $423.4M 70.7% | $438.2M 70.0% | $400.2M 72.3% | — | — | $946.1M 168.6% | $836.5M 149.3% | $614.7M 85.0% | $556.6M 90.1% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $224.6M 31.1% | $197.2M 31.9% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $367.3M 50.8% | $298.4M 48.3% |
| Gross Profit | $155.9M 24.7% | $139.9M 23.3% | $153.6M 24.5% | $121.1M 21.9% | $59.2M 15.3% | $67.5M 17.9% | $11.8M 2.1% | $103.3M 18.4% | $108.4M 15.0% | $60.8M 9.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $100.6M 15.9% | $90.0M 15.0% | $96.6M 15.4% | $91.9M 16.6% | $75.0M 19.3% | $76.7M 20.3% | $96.5M 17.2% | $92.9M 16.6% | $115.4M 16.0% | $108.4M 17.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $475.0M 75.3% | $459.3M 76.7% | $472.6M 75.5% | $432.1M 78.1% | $329.0M 84.7% | $310.2M 82.1% | $549.4M 97.9% | $456.8M 81.6% | — | — |
| Operating Income | $55.4M 8.8% | $49.9M 8.3% | $44.9M 7.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Expense | — | — | $22.9M 3.7% | $16.8M 3.0% | $16.6M 4.3% | $19.3M 5.1% | $21.8M 3.9% | $19.7M 3.5% | $58.0M 8.0% | $58.6M 9.5% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$11.6M -1.8% | $6.9M 1.1% | $9.1M 1.5% | $4.5M 0.8% | $17.5M 4.5% | $3.0M 0.8% | $1.9M 0.3% | -$5.6M -1.0% | -$865K -0.1% | -$4.3M -0.7% |
| Pretax Income | $26.5M 4.2% | $28.7M 4.8% | $31.7M 5.1% | $11.2M 2.0% | -$14.7M -3.8% | -$25.1M -6.6% | -$128.1M -22.8% | -$2.6M -0.5% | -$44.0M -6.1% | -$223.2M -36.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $22.3M 3.5% | -$84.9M -14.2% | $6.2M 1.0% | $3.6M 0.6% | $2.1M 0.5% | $1.8M 0.5% | $2.8M 0.5% | -$3.7M -0.7% | $751K 0.1% | $2.2M 0.3% |
| Net Income | $3.0M 0.5% | $108.3M 18.1% | $25.8M 4.1% | $7.8M 1.4% | $103.3M 26.6% | -$51.1M -13.5% | -$147.4M -26.3% | -$61.6M -11.0% | -$39.0M -5.4% | -$161.5M -26.2% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.02 | $0.83 | $0.20 | $0.06 | $0.82 | $-0.41 | $-1.17 | $-0.50 | $-0.34 | $-1.85 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.02 | $0.82 | $0.20 | $0.06 | $0.82 | $-0.41 | $-1.17 | $-0.50 | $-0.34 | $-1.85 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 133.2M | 131.3M | 129.6M | 128.1M | 126.6M | 125.8M | 125.6M | 124.1M | 114.5M | 87.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 135.2M | 132.2M | 131.2M | 129.8M | 126.6M | 125.8M | 125.6M | 124.1M | 114.5M | 87.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $6.15 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 15.7%/yr for a decade (off $26M normalized FCF).
The market's 15.7% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.13B shares · net debt $104M
mean -306.1% · volatility σ 367% · implied rate exceeded in 0/4 yrs
Central path = implied 15.7%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (367%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $20M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 1%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $73M covers the $0 due within a year 72628000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~14.6% on $158M of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2023 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $682.3B | 24.4× | — | 2.0× | -5.0% | — | 8.7% | 11.1% | 10.7% | — | 4,568 |
| SHEL | $545.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,521 |
| CVX | $391.2B | 31.9× | — | 2.1× | -6.8% | 42.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 6.6% | — | 4,121 |
| TTE | $202.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 951 |
| COP | $166.8B | 21.0× | — | 2.8× | 7.7% | 62.1% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 12.2% | — | 2,450 |
| PBR | $155.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 524 |
| MPC | $128.7B | 31.9× | 11.0× | 1.0× | -4.4% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 23.4% | 20.6% | 0.2× | 1,802 |
| VLO | $127.5B | 54.5× | 24.1× | 1.0× | -5.5% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.7× | 1,781 |
| BP | $117.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,220 |
| PSX | $111.3B | 25.4× | — | 0.8× | -7.5% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 15.1% | 14.6% | — | 2,041 |
| EQNR | $110.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 398 |
| WMB | $87.7B | 33.6× | 17.8× | 7.3× | 13.8% | — | 21.9% | 20.4% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,736 |
| EPD | $84.1B | — | 12.6× | 1.6× | -6.4% | 26.7% | 11.0% | — | — | 3.7× | 1,573 |
| EOG | $79.0B | 15.9× | 7.7× | 3.5× | -4.5% | — | 22.0% | 16.7% | 13.2% | 0.7× | 1,525 |
| SLB | $77.9B | 22.2× | — | 2.2× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 1,624 |
| ET | $72.5B | — | 9.8× | 0.8× | 3.5% | 25.8% | 5.2% | 9.0% | 3.8% | 4.8× | 1,244 |
| KMI | $69.7B | 22.9× | 14.2× | 4.1× | 12.2% | — | 18.0% | 9.8% | 4.8% | 4.5× | 1,745 |
| TRGP | $61.2B | 33.6× | 16.2× | 3.6× | 3.9% | 38.3% | 11.3% | 62.7% | 9.4% | 3.6× | 979 |
| TS | $60.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 248 |
| MPLX | $59.4B | — | — | 4.6× | 8.9% | — | 38.1% | — | — | — | 622 |
| LNG | $59.3B | 11.2× | 7.8× | 3.0× | 27.2% | — | 26.7% | 67.3% | 17.3% | 2.2× | 1,303 |
| OKE | $58.7B | 17.2× | 12.4× | 1.8× | 55.0% | 30.5% | 10.1% | 15.1% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,622 |
| OXY | $58.5B | 36.8× | — | 2.7× | -1.9% | — | 11.0% | 6.6% | 4.2% | — | 1,250 |
| BKR | $56.2B | — | — | 2.0× | -0.3% | — | 9.3% | 13.7% | 13.3% | — | 1,095 |
| FANG | $56.0B | 34.4× | 11.2× | 3.7× | 35.8% | — | 11.1% | 4.5% | 3.2% | 2.3× | 1,141 |
| TTI | $825M | 307.5× | 10.0× | 1.3× | 5.3% | 24.7% | 0.5% | 1.1% | 0.7% | 1.9× | 223 |
Peers = companies sharing TTI's sector (Energy) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 76th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 2.1× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 149.3 | 168.6 | — | — | 72.3 | 70.0 | 70.7 | 68.7 |
| Gross Profit | 18.4 | 2.1 | 17.9 | 15.3 | 21.9 | 24.5 | 23.3 | 24.7 |
| SG&A | 16.6 | 17.2 | 20.3 | 19.3 | 16.6 | 15.4 | 15.0 | 15.9 |
| Operating Income | — | — | — | — | — | 7.2 | 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Income Tax | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.0 | -14.2 | 3.5 |
| Net Income | -11.0 | -26.3 | -13.5 | 26.6 | 1.4 | 4.1 | 18.1 | 0.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TTI: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.