Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 1,011 of 5,944 reporting institutions (99th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -5%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $1.5B covers all $8M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2018-03-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~6.0% on $2.5B of debt.
Cash of $1.5B fully covers short-term debt of $30M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $205.45 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 27.5%/yr for a decade (off $462M normalized FCF).
The market's 27.5% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.19B shares · net debt $973M
mean -47.7% · volatility σ 138% · implied rate exceeded in 2/6 yrs
Central path = implied 27.5%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (138%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $462M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 192 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG | $4.15T | 31.8× | 27.8× | 10.3× | 15.1% | 59.7% | 32.8% | 31.8% | 28.5% | 0.3× | 4,874 |
| META | $1.72T | 29.1× | 17.1× | 8.6× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| AMX | $1.40T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 318 |
| CHT | $354.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $318.0B | 29.8× | 23.7× | 7.0× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $239.2B | 12.0× | 6.4× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $204.2B | 11.9× | 4.2× | 1.5× | 2.5% | — | 12.4% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 0.0× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $200.2B | 15.4× | 10.3× | 2.1× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.2% | 1.8× | 2,883 |
| TMUS | $184.2B | 17.1× | 8.3× | 2.1× | 8.5% | — | 12.4% | 18.6% | 7.6% | 2.7× | 1,648 |
| T | $182.0B | 8.3× | 6.8× | 1.4× | 2.7% | — | 17.5% | 17.4% | 8.1% | 3.2× | 2,848 |
| VEON | $127.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| DASH | $83.1B | 91.3× | 53.5× | 6.1× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| WBD | $70.0B | 97.4× | 15.3× | 1.9× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 36.1× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| LYV | $39.6B | — | 25.1× | 1.6× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| TTWO | $39.0B | — | 424.4× | 5.9× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| TWLO | $37.5B | 1172.6× | 107.1× | 7.4× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.5B | 58.3× | 60.1× | 12.9× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| FOX | $26.9B | 11.9× | — | 1.6× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| OMC | $24.6B | — | 57.5× | 1.4× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| ROKU | $22.8B | 261.1× | 530.2× | 4.8× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| FWONA | $21.5B | — | 39.5× | 4.8× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 283 |
| NWS | $18.9B | 16.1× | — | 2.2× | 2.4% | — | 14.0% | 13.4% | 11.0% | — | 304 |
| CHTR | $18.0B | 3.7× | 5.3× | 0.3× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| TKO | $15.3B | 83.8× | 13.8× | 3.2× | -3.1% | — | 4.1% | 5.2% | 2.6% | 2.9× | 616 |
Peers = companies sharing TTWO's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.66B 100.0% | $5.63B 100.0% | $5.35B 100.0% | $5.35B 100.0% | $3.50B 100.0% | $3.37B 100.0% | $3.09B 100.0% | $2.67B 100.0% | $1.79B 100.0% | $1.78B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.85B 42.8% | $2.57B 45.6% | $3.11B 58.1% | $3.06B 57.3% | $1.54B 43.8% | $1.54B 45.5% | $1.54B 49.9% | $1.52B 57.1% | $898.3M 50.1% | $1.02B 57.5% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $898.3M 50.1% | $1.02B 57.5% |
| Gross Profit | $3.81B 57.2% | $3.06B 54.4% | $2.24B 41.9% | $2.29B 42.7% | $1.97B 56.2% | $1.84B 54.5% | $1.55B 50.1% | $1.14B 42.9% | $894.6M 49.9% | $756.8M 42.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $874.4M 13.1% | $883.3M 15.7% | $716.1M 13.4% | $839.5M 15.7% | $510.9M 14.6% | $390.4M 11.6% | $318.2M 10.3% | $281.2M 10.5% | $247.8M 13.8% | $211.4M 11.9% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $3.91B 58.8% | $7.45B 132.3% | $5.83B 109.0% | $3.45B 64.5% | $1.50B 42.7% | $1.21B 35.8% | $1.12B 36.3% | $938.1M 35.2% | $759.0M 42.3% | $665.5M 37.4% |
| Operating Income | -$104.2M -1.6% | -$4.39B -77.9% | -$3.59B -67.1% | -$1.17B -21.8% | $473.6M 13.5% | $629.4M 18.7% | $425.3M 13.8% | $206.7M 7.7% | $135.6M 7.6% | $91.3M 5.1% |
| Interest Expense | $151.4M 2.3% | $167.3M 3.0% | $140.6M 2.6% | $129.6M 2.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$93.6M -1.4% | -$100.2M -1.8% | -$112.2M -2.1% | -$141.9M -2.7% | -$14.2M -0.4% | $8.8M 0.3% | $38.5M 1.2% | $26.1M 1.0% | $1.0M 0.1% | -$15.7M -0.9% |
| Pretax Income | -$197.8M -3.0% | -$4.49B -79.7% | -$3.70B -69.2% | -$1.34B -25.0% | $465.4M 13.3% | $677.8M 20.1% | $458.4M 14.8% | $232.8M 8.7% | $136.6M 7.6% | $77.0M 4.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | $100.4M 1.5% | -$12.4M -0.2% | $41.4M 0.8% | -$213.4M -4.0% | $47.4M 1.4% | $88.9M 2.6% | $54.0M 1.7% | -$101.1M -3.8% | -$36.9M -2.1% | $9.7M 0.5% |
| Net Income | -$298.2M -4.5% | -$4.48B -79.5% | -$3.74B -70.0% | -$1.12B -21.0% | $418.0M 11.9% | $588.9M 17.5% | $404.5M 13.1% | $333.8M 12.5% | $173.5M 9.7% | $67.3M 3.8% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-1.62 | $-25.58 | $-22.01 | $-7.03 | $3.62 | $5.14 | $3.58 | $2.95 | $1.57 | $0.73 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-1.62 | $-25.58 | $-22.01 | $-7.03 | $3.58 | $5.09 | $3.54 | $2.90 | $1.54 | $0.72 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 183.9M | 175.1M | 170.1M | 159.9M | 115.5M | 114.6M | 113.1M | 113.2M | 110.2M | 91.9M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | — | — | 170.1M | 159.9M | 116.8M | 115.7M | 114.1M | 115.2M | 112.9M | 94.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
Where each multiple sits in its own 15-yr range · 91th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 15-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 57.1 | 49.9 | 45.5 | 43.8 | 57.3 | 58.1 | 45.6 | 42.8 |
| Gross Profit | 42.9 | 50.1 | 54.5 | 56.2 | 42.7 | 41.9 | 54.4 | 57.2 |
| SG&A | 10.5 | 10.3 | 11.6 | 14.6 | 15.7 | 13.4 | 15.7 | 13.1 |
| Operating Income | 7.7 | 13.8 | 18.7 | 13.5 | -21.8 | -67.1 | -77.9 | -1.6 |
| Income Tax | -3.8 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 1.4 | -4.0 | 0.8 | -0.2 | 1.5 |
| Net Income | 12.5 | 13.1 | 17.5 | 11.9 | -21.0 | -70.0 | -79.5 | -4.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TTWO: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.