Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 2,345 of 5,944 reporting institutions (100th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $258.14 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 34.2%/yr for a decade (off $1.8B normalized FCF).
The market's 34.2% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.91B shares · net debt $10.8B
mean 5.6% · volatility σ 40% · implied rate exceeded in 1/9 yrs
Central path = implied 34.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (40%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
Peers = companies sharing TXN's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend exceeds free cash flow (192%) — funded from the balance sheet or debt, a red flag if it persists. Last year: $5.0B dividends + $1.5B buybacks = $6.5B returned on $2.6B FCF.
9 consecutive years of dividend increases · 14%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 16%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~3.9% on $14.0B of debt.
Cash of $3.2B fully covers short-term debt of $500M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 100th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 34.9 | 36.3 | 35.9 | 32.5 | 31.2 | 37.1 | 41.9 | 43.0 |
| Gross Profit | 65.1 | 63.7 | 64.1 | 67.5 | 68.8 | 62.9 | 58.1 | 57.0 |
| R&D | 9.9 | 10.7 | 10.6 | 8.5 | 8.3 | 10.6 | 12.5 | 11.8 |
| SG&A | 10.7 | 11.4 | 11.2 | 9.1 | 8.5 | 10.4 | 11.5 | 10.5 |
| Operating Income | 42.5 | 39.8 | 40.8 | 48.8 | 50.6 | 41.8 | 34.9 | 34.1 |
| Income Tax | 7.0 | 4.9 | 2.9 | 6.3 | 6.4 | 5.2 | 4.2 | 4.0 |
| Net Income | 35.4 | 34.9 | 38.7 | 42.4 | 43.7 | 37.2 | 30.7 | 28.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TXN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.68B 100.0% | $15.64B 100.0% | $17.52B 100.0% | $20.03B 100.0% | $18.34B 100.0% | $14.46B 100.0% | $14.38B 100.0% | $15.78B 100.0% | $14.96B 100.0% | $13.37B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $7.60B 43.0% | $6.55B 41.9% | $6.50B 37.1% | $6.26B 31.2% | $5.97B 32.5% | $5.19B 35.9% | $5.22B 36.3% | $5.51B 34.9% | $5.35B 35.7% | $5.11B 38.2% |
| Gross Profit | $10.08B 57.0% | $9.09B 58.1% | $11.02B 62.9% | $13.77B 68.8% | $12.38B 67.5% | $9.27B 64.1% | $9.16B 63.7% | $10.28B 65.1% | $9.61B 64.3% | $8.26B 61.8% |
| Research & Development | $2.08B 11.8% | $1.96B 12.5% | $1.86B 10.6% | $1.67B 8.3% | $1.55B 8.5% | $1.53B 10.6% | $1.54B 10.7% | $1.56B 9.9% | $1.51B 10.1% | $1.36B 10.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.86B 10.5% | $1.79B 11.5% | $1.82B 10.4% | $1.70B 8.5% | $1.67B 9.1% | $1.62B 11.2% | $1.65B 11.4% | $1.68B 10.7% | $1.69B 11.3% | $1.74B 13.0% |
| Operating Income | $6.02B 34.1% | $5.46B 34.9% | $7.33B 41.8% | $10.14B 50.6% | $8.96B 48.8% | $5.89B 40.8% | $5.72B 39.8% | $6.71B 42.5% | $6.08B 40.7% | $4.86B 36.3% |
| Interest Expense | $543.0M 3.1% | $508.0M 3.2% | $353.0M 2.0% | $214.0M 1.1% | $184.0M 1.0% | $190.0M 1.3% | $170.0M 1.2% | $125.0M 0.8% | $78.0M 0.5% | $80.0M 0.6% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $11.0M 0.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $230.0M 1.3% | $496.0M 3.2% | $440.0M 2.5% | $106.0M 0.5% | $143.0M 0.8% | $313.0M 2.2% | $175.0M 1.2% | $98.0M 0.6% | $75.0M 0.5% | $155.0M 1.2% |
| Pretax Income | $5.71B 32.3% | $5.45B 34.9% | $7.42B 42.3% | $10.03B 50.1% | $8.92B 48.6% | $6.02B 41.6% | $5.73B 39.8% | $6.69B 42.4% | $6.08B 40.6% | $4.93B 36.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $709.0M 4.0% | $654.0M 4.2% | $908.0M 5.2% | $1.28B 6.4% | $1.15B 6.3% | $422.0M 2.9% | $711.0M 4.9% | $1.11B 7.0% | $2.40B 16.0% | $1.33B 10.0% |
| Net Income | $5.00B 28.3% | $4.80B 30.7% | $6.51B 37.2% | $8.75B 43.7% | $7.77B 42.4% | $5.59B 38.7% | $5.02B 34.9% | $5.58B 35.4% | $3.68B 24.6% | $3.60B 26.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $5.47 | $5.24 | $7.13 | $9.51 | $8.38 | $6.05 | $5.33 | $5.71 | $3.68 | $3.54 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $5.45 | $5.20 | $7.07 | $9.41 | $8.26 | $5.97 | $5.24 | $5.59 | $3.61 | $3.48 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 909.0M | 912.0M | 908.0M | 916.0M | 923.0M | 921.0M | 936.0M | 970.0M | 991.0M | 1.00B |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 913.0M | 919.0M | 916.0M | 926.0M | 936.0M | 933.0M | 952.0M | 990.0M | 1.01B | 1.02B |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position