Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 745 of 5,944 reporting institutions (98th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $341.57 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 13.2%/yr for a decade (off $534M normalized FCF).
The market's 13.2% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.05B shares · net debt -$416M
mean 19.7% · volatility σ 28% · implied rate exceeded in 3/9 yrs
Central path = implied 13.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (28%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.33B 100.0% | $2.14B 100.0% | $1.95B 100.0% | $1.85B 100.0% | $1.59B 100.0% | $1.12B 100.0% | $1.09B 100.0% | $935.3M 100.0% | $840.9M 100.0% | $759.9M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.25B 53.5% | $1.20B 56.2% | $1.09B 55.9% | $1.07B 57.6% | $882.6M 55.4% | $574.2M 51.4% | $569.5M 52.4% | $495.7M 53.0% | $441.5M 52.5% | $400.7M 52.7% |
| Gross Profit | $1.08B 46.5% | $935.8M 43.8% | $861.1M 44.1% | $783.9M 42.4% | $709.6M 44.6% | $542.5M 48.6% | $516.9M 47.6% | $439.6M 47.0% | $399.4M 47.5% | $359.2M 47.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $316.4M 13.6% | $300.9M 14.1% | $308.6M 15.8% | $267.3M 14.4% | $390.6M 24.5% | $259.6M 23.2% | $257.7M 23.7% | $207.6M 22.2% | $175.9M 20.9% | $165.2M 21.7% |
| Operating Income | $357.7M 15.3% | $299.5M 14.0% | $218.5M 11.2% | $214.2M 11.6% | $180.7M 11.4% | $172.9M 15.5% | $156.4M 14.4% | $152.5M 16.3% | $162.8M 19.4% | $137.7M 18.1% |
| Interest Expense | $5.0M 0.2% | $5.9M 0.3% | $23.6M 1.2% | $28.4M 1.5% | $23.3M 1.5% | $1.0M 0.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $37.6M 1.6% | $14.6M 0.7% | $3.3M 0.2% | $1.7M 0.1% | $1.5M 0.1% | $3.1M 0.3% | $5.5M 0.5% | $3.4M 0.4% | $698K 0.1% | -$2.0M -0.3% |
| Pretax Income | $390.3M 16.7% | $308.2M 14.4% | $198.2M 10.2% | $187.6M 10.1% | $159.0M 10.0% | $175.0M 15.7% | $159.8M 14.7% | $155.9M 16.7% | $163.5M 19.4% | $135.7M 17.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $74.7M 3.2% | $45.1M 2.1% | $32.3M 1.7% | $23.4M 1.3% | -$2.5M -0.2% | -$19.8M -1.8% | $13.3M 1.2% | $8.4M 0.9% | -$6.1M -0.7% | $22.0M 2.9% |
| Net Income | $315.6M 13.5% | $263.0M 12.3% | $165.9M 8.5% | $164.2M 8.9% | $161.5M 10.1% | $194.8M 17.4% | $146.5M 13.5% | $147.5M 15.8% | $169.6M 20.2% | $113.7M 15.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $7.32 | $6.17 | $3.95 | $3.95 | $3.95 | $4.87 | $3.79 | $3.84 | $4.55 | $3.12 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $7.20 | $6.05 | $3.88 | $3.87 | $3.82 | $4.69 | $3.65 | $3.68 | $4.32 | $2.92 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 43.1M | 42.6M | 42.0M | 41.5M | 40.8M | 40.0M | 38.6M | 38.4M | 37.3M | 36.4M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 43.8M | 43.5M | 42.8M | 42.4M | 42.2M | 41.5M | 40.1M | 40.1M | 39.2M | 39.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $175M buybacks = $175M returned on $638M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 7%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~0.8% on $600M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 7th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 2.1× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 53.0 | 52.4 | 51.4 | 55.4 | 57.6 | 55.9 | 56.2 | 53.5 |
| Gross Profit | 47.0 | 47.6 | 48.6 | 44.6 | 42.4 | 44.1 | 43.8 | 46.5 |
| SG&A | 22.2 | 23.7 | 23.2 | 24.5 | 14.4 | 15.8 | 14.1 | 13.6 |
| Operating Income | 16.3 | 14.4 | 15.5 | 11.4 | 11.6 | 11.2 | 14.0 | 15.3 |
| Income Tax | 0.9 | 1.2 | -1.8 | -0.2 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 3.2 |
| Net Income | 15.8 | 13.5 | 17.4 | 10.1 | 8.9 | 8.5 | 12.3 | 13.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TYL: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.83T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.20T | 43.6× | 39.0× | 24.1× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.91T | 44.6× | 34.3× | 11.8× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.64T | 27.3× | 19.3× | 11.0× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.61T | 71.2× | 63.6× | 25.2× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 122.1× | 57.5× | 27.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $835.4B | 193.4× | 197.6× | 24.1× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $504.6B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $426.7B | 42.3× | 35.8× | 7.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $416.9B | 276.7× | 288.5× | 93.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $367.3B | 64.9× | 34.6× | 3.2× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.6B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $329.4B | 48.0× | 37.9× | 11.6× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $325.1B | — | — | 1051.3× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $283.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| SAP | $261.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ARM | $259.6B | 287.0× | 223.6× | 52.8× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| PANW | $250.9B | 234.8× | 156.8× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| ANET | $248.2B | 71.8× | 62.7× | 27.6× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| TXN | $236.9B | 47.8× | 31.2× | 13.4× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $232.8B | 32.1× | 25.2× | 5.6× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.5B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $221.9B | — | — | 30.2× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $198.5B | 36.9× | 14.9× | 4.5× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $194.6B | 74.8× | 127.2× | 23.8× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| TYL | $16.7B | 48.1× | 32.8× | 7.2× | 9.1% | 46.5% | 13.5% | 8.5% | 7.3% | 1.2× | 745 |
Peers = companies sharing TYL's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.