Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional distribution: ownership decreased -2.35% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $5.82 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -14.3%/yr for a decade (off $12M normalized FCF).
The market's -14.3% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt -$10M
mean 77.0% · volatility σ 175% · implied rate exceeded in 4/7 yrs
Central path = implied -14.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (175%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 192 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG | $4.15T | 31.8× | 27.8× | 10.3× | 15.1% | 59.7% | 32.8% | 31.8% | 28.5% | 0.3× | 4,874 |
| META | $1.72T | 29.1× | 17.1× | 8.6× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| AMX | $1.40T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 318 |
| CHT | $354.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $318.0B | 29.8× | 23.7× | 7.0× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $239.2B | 12.0× | 6.4× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $204.2B | 11.9× | 4.2× | 1.5× | 2.5% | — | 12.4% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 0.0× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $200.2B | 15.4× | 10.3× | 2.1× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.2% | 1.8× | 2,883 |
| TMUS | $184.2B | 17.1× | 8.3× | 2.1× | 8.5% | — | 12.4% | 18.6% | 7.6% | 2.7× | 1,648 |
| T | $182.0B | 8.3× | 6.8× | 1.4× | 2.7% | — | 17.5% | 17.4% | 8.1% | 3.2× | 2,848 |
| VEON | $127.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| DASH | $83.1B | 91.3× | 53.5× | 6.1× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| WBD | $70.0B | 97.4× | 15.3× | 1.9× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 36.1× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| LYV | $39.6B | — | 25.1× | 1.6× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| TTWO | $39.0B | — | 424.4× | 5.9× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| TWLO | $37.5B | 1172.6× | 107.1× | 7.4× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.5B | 58.3× | 60.1× | 12.9× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| FOX | $26.9B | 11.9× | — | 1.6× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| OMC | $24.6B | — | 57.5× | 1.4× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| ROKU | $22.8B | 261.1× | 530.2× | 4.8× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| FWONA | $21.5B | — | 39.5× | 4.8× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 283 |
| NWS | $18.9B | 16.1× | — | 2.2× | 2.4% | — | 14.0% | 13.4% | 11.0% | — | 304 |
| CHTR | $18.0B | 3.7× | 5.3× | 0.3× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| TKO | $15.3B | 83.8× | 13.8× | 3.2× | -3.1% | — | 4.1% | 5.2% | 2.6% | 2.9× | 616 |
| TZOO | $64M | 14.2× | 7.6× | 0.7× | 9.3% | 80.3% | 5.1% | -62.5% | -62.5% | — | 85 |
Peers = companies sharing TZOO's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $91.7M 100.0% | $83.9M 100.0% | $84.5M 100.0% | $70.6M 100.0% | $62.7M 100.0% | $53.6M 100.0% | $104.9M 100.0% | $111.3M 100.0% | $106.5M 100.0% | $114.3M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $18.1M 19.7% | $10.5M 12.5% | $10.9M 12.9% | $10.0M 14.2% | $11.4M 18.2% | $10.6M 19.7% | $11.4M 10.9% | $12.3M 11.0% | $12.9M 12.1% | $13.9M 12.1% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $12.9M 12.1% | $13.9M 12.1% |
| Gross Profit | $73.6M 80.3% | $73.4M 87.5% | $73.5M 87.1% | $60.6M 85.8% | $51.3M 81.8% | $43.0M 80.3% | $93.5M 89.1% | $99.1M 89.0% | $93.6M 87.9% | $100.4M 87.9% |
| Research & Development | $2.6M 2.8% | $2.4M 2.9% | $2.1M 2.5% | $2.1M 2.9% | $2.6M 4.1% | $3.1M 5.7% | $6.7M 6.4% | $9.0M 8.1% | $9.2M 8.7% | $9.1M 8.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $18.9M 20.6% | $18.1M 21.5% | $18.1M 21.4% | $17.9M 25.4% | $19.8M 31.5% | $20.5M 38.2% | $18.4M 17.5% | $23.3M 20.9% | $22.6M 21.2% | $22.7M 19.9% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $66.7M 72.8% | $54.9M 65.5% | $58.0M 68.6% | $53.0M 75.1% | $52.6M 83.9% | $57.1M 106.5% | $76.4M 72.9% | $90.8M 81.6% | $89.1M 83.6% | $90.2M 79.0% |
| Operating Income | $6.9M 7.5% | $18.5M 22.0% | $15.6M 18.4% | $7.6M 10.7% | -$1.3M -2.1% | -$14.1M -26.3% | $17.0M 16.2% | $8.2M 7.4% | $4.5M 4.3% | $10.2M 8.9% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | — | — | $25K 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $753K 0.8% | $588K 0.7% | $1.5M 1.8% | $2.4M 3.4% | $4.0M 6.4% | $455K 0.8% | -$42K -0.0% | $48K 0.0% | $173K 0.2% | -$187K -0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $7.7M 8.3% | $19.1M 22.7% | $17.1M 20.3% | $10.0M 14.1% | $2.7M 4.3% | -$13.6M -25.4% | $17.0M 16.2% | $8.3M 7.4% | $4.7M 4.4% | $10.0M 8.8% |
| Income Tax Expense | $2.7M 2.9% | $5.4M 6.4% | $5.1M 6.0% | $3.3M 4.6% | $1.8M 2.8% | -$2.4M -4.5% | $4.7M 4.5% | $3.6M 3.3% | $3.1M 2.9% | $4.0M 3.5% |
| Net Income | $4.7M 5.1% | $13.6M 16.2% | $12.4M 14.6% | $6.6M 9.4% | $911K 1.5% | -$13.4M -25.0% | $4.2M 4.0% | $4.7M 4.2% | $3.5M 3.3% | $6.6M 5.8% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.42 | $1.08 | $0.83 | $0.54 | $0.08 | $-1.18 | $0.35 | $0.38 | $0.27 | $0.47 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.41 | $1.06 | $0.83 | $0.53 | $0.07 | $-1.18 | $0.35 | $0.37 | $0.27 | $0.47 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 11.2M | 12.6M | 14.9M | 12.4M | 11.6M | 11.3M | 11.8M | 12.3M | 12.9M | 14.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 11.5M | 12.9M | 15.0M | 12.6M | 13.0M | 11.3M | 12.0M | 12.5M | 12.9M | 14.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $13M buybacks = $13M returned on $6M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -63%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $10M covers all $7M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2015-09-30 (10-Q).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Interest last disclosed in FY2020 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 19th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 11.0 | 10.9 | 19.7 | 18.2 | 14.2 | 12.9 | 12.5 | 19.7 |
| Gross Profit | 89.0 | 89.1 | 80.3 | 81.8 | 85.8 | 87.1 | 87.5 | 80.3 |
| R&D | 8.1 | 6.4 | 5.7 | 4.1 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 2.8 |
| SG&A | 20.9 | 17.5 | 38.2 | 31.5 | 25.4 | 21.4 | 21.5 | 20.6 |
| Operating Income | 7.4 | 16.2 | -26.3 | -2.1 | 10.7 | 18.4 | 22.0 | 7.5 |
| Income Tax | 3.3 | 4.5 | -4.5 | 2.8 | 4.6 | 6.0 | 6.4 | 2.9 |
| Net Income | 4.2 | 4.0 | -25.0 | 1.5 | 9.4 | 14.6 | 16.2 | 5.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TZOO: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.