Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional distribution: ownership decreased -11.05% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $3.81 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -2.2%/yr for a decade (off $32M normalized FCF).
The market's -2.2% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.03B shares · net debt $203M
mean 45.6% · volatility σ 84% · implied rate exceeded in 6/9 yrs
Central path = implied -2.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (84%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $216.9M 100.0% | $274.8M 100.0% | $297.9M 100.0% | $317.3M 100.0% | $302.0M 100.0% | $291.8M 100.0% | $222.6M 100.0% | $149.9M 100.0% | $98.0M 100.0% | $74.8M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $54.8M 25.2% | $81.1M 29.5% | $96.4M 32.4% | $103.7M 32.7% | $99.5M 32.9% | $98.4M 33.7% | $69.1M 31.0% | $48.6M 32.4% | $33.6M 34.4% | $27.6M 36.9% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $33.6M 34.4% | $27.6M 36.9% |
| Gross Profit | $162.1M 74.8% | $193.7M 70.5% | $201.5M 67.6% | $213.6M 67.3% | $202.6M 67.1% | $193.3M 66.3% | $153.5M 69.0% | $101.3M 67.6% | $64.3M 65.6% | $47.2M 63.1% |
| Research & Development | $36.5M 16.8% | $47.4M 17.2% | $49.4M 16.6% | $46.2M 14.6% | $42.7M 14.1% | $39.0M 13.4% | $29.0M 13.0% | $20.9M 14.0% | $15.8M 16.1% | $14.9M 20.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $38.0M 17.5% | $49.5M 18.0% | $61.3M 20.6% | $70.5M 22.2% | $76.9M 25.5% | $68.1M 23.3% | $48.1M 21.6% | $32.0M 21.4% | $23.3M 23.8% | $18.3M 24.5% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $157.7M 72.7% | $296.0M 107.7% | $365.4M 122.7% | $253.8M 80.0% | $237.2M 78.6% | $217.1M 74.4% | $177.8M 79.9% | $106.9M 71.3% | $75.4M 77.0% | $55.7M 74.5% |
| Operating Income | $4.4M 2.0% | -$102.3M -37.2% | -$163.9M -55.0% | -$40.2M -12.7% | -$34.7M -11.5% | -$23.8M -8.2% | -$24.3M -10.9% | -$5.6M -3.7% | -$11.1M -11.4% | -$8.5M -11.4% |
| Interest Expense | — | $8.9M 3.3% | $18.7M 6.3% | $29.1M 9.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$43.1M -19.9% | -$7.8M -2.8% | -$18.4M -6.2% | -$29.9M -9.4% | -$31.9M -10.6% | -$31.6M -10.8% | -$27.9M -12.5% | -$15.1M -10.0% | -$6.3M -6.4% | -$3.5M -4.6% |
| Pretax Income | -$38.7M -17.8% | -$110.1M -40.1% | -$182.4M -61.2% | -$70.2M -22.1% | -$66.6M -22.0% | -$55.5M -19.0% | -$52.2M -23.4% | -$20.6M -13.8% | -$17.4M -17.8% | -$12.0M -16.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $232K 0.1% | $2.6M 1.0% | -$2.5M -0.8% | -$1.7M -0.5% | -$8.3M -2.8% | -$4.2M -1.5% | -$6.8M -3.1% | -$9.8M -6.5% | $1.3M 1.3% | $1.5M 2.0% |
| Net Income | $40.4M 18.6% | $112.7M 41.0% | $179.9M 60.4% | -$68.4M -21.6% | -$58.2M -19.3% | -$51.2M -17.6% | -$45.4M -20.4% | -$10.8M -7.2% | -$18.7M -19.1% | -$13.5M -18.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-1.56 | $-4.26 | $-5.77 | $-2.23 | $-1.92 | $-1.92 | $-1.96 | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-1.56 | $-4.26 | $-5.77 | $-2.23 | $-1.92 | $-1.92 | $-1.96 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 28.6M | 27.8M | 32.1M | 31.5M | 30.3M | 26.6M | 23.1M | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 28.6M | 27.8M | 32.1M | 31.5M | 30.3M | 26.6M | 23.1M | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $24M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: -21%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $29M covers the $9M due within a year 3.3× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~3.1% on $290M of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2024 (no longer broken out).
Cash of $29M fully covers short-term debt of $8M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 12-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 12-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 5.0× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 32.4 | 31.0 | 33.7 | 32.9 | 32.7 | 32.4 | 29.5 | 25.2 |
| Gross Profit | 67.6 | 69.0 | 66.3 | 67.1 | 67.3 | 67.6 | 70.5 | 74.8 |
| R&D | 14.0 | 13.0 | 13.4 | 14.1 | 14.6 | 16.6 | 17.2 | 16.8 |
| SG&A | 21.4 | 21.6 | 23.3 | 25.5 | 22.2 | 20.6 | 18.0 | 17.5 |
| Operating Income | -3.7 | -10.9 | -8.2 | -11.5 | -12.7 | -55.0 | -37.2 | 2.0 |
| Income Tax | -6.5 | -3.1 | -1.5 | -2.8 | -0.5 | -0.8 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
| Net Income | -7.2 | -20.4 | -17.6 | -19.3 | -21.6 | 60.4 | 41.0 | 18.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on UPLD: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| UPLD | $111M | — | 8.6× | 0.5× | -21.1% | 74.8% | -17.9% | 80.4% | -21.1% | 6.4× | 46 |
Peers = companies sharing UPLD's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position