Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 395 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $75.84 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 8.0%/yr for a decade (off $315M normalized FCF).
The market's 8.0% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.09B shares · net debt -$369M
mean -13.4% · volatility σ 84% · implied rate exceeded in 2/8 yrs
Central path = implied 8.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (84%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
8/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $154M buybacks = $154M returned on $315M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 17%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 2.5× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 65.8 | 68.5 | 74.6 | 67.2 | 70.1 | 66.5 | 65.2 | 64.0 |
| Gross Profit | 34.1 | 31.1 | 25.0 | 32.8 | 29.8 | 33.3 | 34.7 | 36.0 |
| SG&A | 24.4 | 25.0 | 24.9 | 23.9 | 25.0 | 26.0 | 26.2 | 26.1 |
| Operating Income | 9.7 | 5.8 | 0.1 | 9.0 | 4.7 | 7.2 | 8.5 | 9.8 |
| Income Tax | 2.2 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 2.1 |
| Net Income | 7.5 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 6.8 | 3.3 | 5.6 | 7.3 | 7.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on URBN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.17B 100.0% | $5.55B 100.0% | $5.15B 100.0% | $4.80B 100.0% | $4.55B 100.0% | $3.45B 100.0% | $3.98B 100.0% | $3.95B 100.0% | $3.62B 100.0% | $3.55B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $3.95B 64.0% | $3.62B 65.2% | $3.43B 66.5% | $3.36B 70.1% | $3.05B 67.2% | $2.57B 74.6% | $2.73B 68.5% | $2.60B 65.8% | $2.43B 67.2% | $2.30B 64.9% |
| Gross Profit | $2.22B 36.0% | $1.93B 34.7% | $1.72B 33.3% | $1.43B 29.8% | $1.49B 32.8% | $861.9M 25.0% | $1.24B 31.1% | $1.35B 34.1% | $1.18B 32.5% | $1.24B 35.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.61B 26.1% | $1.45B 26.2% | $1.34B 26.0% | $1.20B 25.0% | $1.09B 23.9% | $857.9M 24.9% | $994.0M 25.0% | $965.4M 24.4% | $915.6M 25.3% | $906.1M 25.6% |
| Operating Income | $605.6M 9.8% | $473.8M 8.5% | $369.8M 7.2% | $226.6M 4.7% | $408.6M 9.0% | $4.0M 0.1% | $231.9M 5.8% | $381.3M 9.7% | $259.9M 7.2% | $338.5M 9.5% |
| Interest Expense | $4.9M 0.1% | $6.1M 0.1% | $7.7M 0.1% | $1.3M 0.0% | $1.1M 0.0% | $3.4M 0.1% | $1.2M 0.0% | $1.8M 0.0% | — | — |
| Interest & Investment Income | $41.7M 0.7% | $37.1M 0.7% | $23.6M 0.5% | $2.0M 0.0% | $2.3M 0.1% | $3.1M 0.1% | $10.6M 0.3% | $9.5M 0.2% | $4.9M 0.1% | $1.9M 0.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | — | — | — | — | — | -$173K -0.0% | -$1.6M -0.0% | -$3.5M -0.1% | — | — |
| Pretax Income | $596.9M 9.7% | $500.2M 9.0% | $381.6M 7.4% | $221.3M 4.6% | $404.6M 8.9% | $3.5M 0.1% | $239.7M 6.0% | $385.6M 9.8% | $261.4M 7.2% | $338.1M 9.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $132.0M 2.1% | $97.7M 1.8% | $93.9M 1.8% | $61.6M 1.3% | $94.0M 2.1% | $2.3M 0.1% | $71.6M 1.8% | $87.5M 2.2% | $153.1M 4.2% | $120.0M 3.4% |
| Net Income | $464.9M 7.5% | $402.5M 7.3% | $287.7M 5.6% | $159.7M 3.3% | $310.6M 6.8% | $1.2M 0.0% | $168.1M 4.2% | $298.0M 7.5% | $108.3M 3.0% | $218.1M 6.2% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $5.15 | $4.34 | $3.10 | $1.71 | $3.17 | $0.01 | $1.68 | $2.75 | $0.97 | $1.87 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $5.06 | $4.26 | $3.05 | $1.70 | $3.13 | $0.01 | $1.67 | $2.72 | $0.96 | $1.86 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 90.2M | 92.7M | 92.7M | 93.2M | 98.0M | 97.8M | 99.8M | 108.3M | 111.9M | 116.9M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 91.8M | 94.4M | 94.3M | 94.1M | 99.3M | 98.5M | 100.6M | 109.7M | 112.4M | 117.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.65T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.34T | 331.6× | 142.2× | 14.2× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $608.8B | 59.5× | 24.6× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $448.4B | 33.4× | 32.3× | 7.3× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $301.3B | 21.3× | 14.3× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $199.3B | 134.1× | — | 1.3× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $136.0B | 25.2× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $131.2B | 185.7× | 113.0× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $110.7B | 59.7× | 26.9× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.9B | 16.4× | 12.0× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $102.7B | — | 38.3× | 8.4× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $93.3B | 46.7× | — | 3.2× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $89.1B | 35.2× | 20.7× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $87.3B | 170.2× | 91.9× | 12.4× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $76.2B | 25.8× | 3.7× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $72.5B | 34.0× | 21.6× | 3.2× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $70.5B | 28.2× | 19.2× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $70.4B | 49.9× | 24.2× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $68.8B | 16.3× | — | 3.8× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $63.4B | 41.1× | 25.1× | 2.8× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $53.1B | — | 4.4× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $53.1B | 17.0× | — | 1.1× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| EBAY | $49.0B | 25.1× | 17.8× | 4.4× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.8B | 19.7× | 13.3× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $45.0B | 29.5× | 19.4× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| URBN | $6.9B | 15.2× | 8.9× | 1.1× | 11.1% | 36.0% | 7.5% | 16.5% | 16.5% | — | 395 |
Peers = companies sharing URBN's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.