Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 335 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 7 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
2/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$109M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -6%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~0.3% on $676M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 12-yr range · 78th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 12-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 46.5 | 67.3 | 0.0 | 57.0 | 62.7 | 47.9 | 71.6 | 79.1 |
| SG&A | 44.6 | 243.2 | 867.4 | 480.5 | 203.6 | 73.6 | 46.9 | 98.3 |
| Operating Income | -67.2 | -691.9 | -1485.3 | -1112.6 | -359.1 | -85.3 | -60.8 | -153.4 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | -0.5 | -1.5 |
| Net Income | -80.0 | -649.5 | -1681.1 | 0.0 | -0.5 | 0.3 | -0.1 | -0.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on UUUU: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $65.9M 100.0% | $78.1M 100.0% | $37.9M 100.0% | $12.5M 100.0% | $3.2M 100.0% | $1.7M 100.0% | $5.9M 100.0% | $31.7M 100.0% | $31.0M 100.0% | $54.6M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $52.2M 79.1% | $55.9M 71.6% | $18.2M 47.9% | $7.8M 62.7% | $1.8M 57.0% | $0 0.0% | $3.9M 67.3% | $14.8M 46.5% | $19.4M 62.5% | $35.5M 65.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $64.8M 98.3% | $36.6M 46.9% | $27.9M 73.6% | $25.5M 203.6% | $15.3M 480.5% | $14.4M 867.4% | $14.3M 243.2% | $14.2M 44.6% | $14.9M 48.1% | $15.5M 28.4% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $167.1M 253.4% | $125.6M 160.8% | $70.3M 185.3% | $57.5M 459.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Income | -$101.2M -153.4% | -$47.5M -60.8% | -$32.4M -85.3% | -$44.9M -359.1% | -$35.4M -1112.6% | -$24.6M -1485.3% | -$40.6M -691.9% | -$21.3M -67.2% | -$28.5M -91.7% | -$38.8M -71.1% |
| Interest Expense | $2.3M 3.5% | — | — | — | $54K 1.7% | $952K 57.4% | $1.5M 25.4% | $1.7M 5.4% | $2.1M 6.8% | $2.3M 4.2% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | $44K 1.4% | $153K 9.2% | $482K 8.2% | $336K 1.1% | $161K 0.5% | $143K 0.3% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $14.1M 21.3% | -$698K -0.9% | $132.4M 349.1% | -$15.0M -119.9% | $36.9M 1158.1% | -$3.2M -195.7% | $4.0M 67.8% | -$2.3M -7.3% | $2.6M 8.3% | $1.2M 2.2% |
| Pretax Income | -$87.1M -132.1% | -$48.2M -61.7% | $100.0M 263.7% | -$59.9M -479.0% | $1.4M 45.5% | -$27.9M -1681.1% | -$38.1M -649.5% | -$25.4M -80.0% | -$28.0M -90.2% | -$39.9M -73.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$979K -1.5% | -$372K -0.5% | $276K 0.7% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% |
| Net Income | -$86K -0.1% | -$48K -0.1% | $100K 0.3% | -$60K -0.5% | $1K 0.0% | -$27.9M -1681.1% | -$38.1M -649.5% | -$25.4M -80.0% | -$28.0M -90.2% | -$39.9M -73.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.38 | $-0.28 | $0.63 | $-0.38 | $0.01 | $-0.23 | $-0.40 | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.38 | $-0.28 | $0.62 | $-0.38 | $0.01 | $-0.23 | $-0.40 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 224.7M | 172.0M | 159.1M | 157.3M | 146.9M | 121.2M | 95.7M | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 224.7M | 172.0M | 160.2M | 157.3M | 149.7M | 121.2M | 0 | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $683.4B | 24.4× | — | 2.1× | -5.0% | — | 8.7% | 11.1% | 10.7% | — | 4,568 |
| SHEL | $537.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,521 |
| CVX | $387.4B | 31.6× | — | 2.0× | -6.8% | 42.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 6.6% | — | 4,121 |
| TTE | $200.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 951 |
| COP | $165.1B | 20.8× | — | 2.8× | 7.7% | 62.1% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 12.2% | — | 2,450 |
| PBR | $154.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 524 |
| MPC | $129.6B | 32.1× | 11.1× | 1.0× | -4.4% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 23.4% | 20.6% | 0.2× | 1,802 |
| VLO | $127.7B | 54.6× | 24.1× | 1.0× | -5.5% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.7× | 1,781 |
| BP | $114.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,220 |
| PSX | $110.9B | 25.3× | — | 0.8× | -7.5% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 15.1% | 14.6% | — | 2,041 |
| EQNR | $110.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 398 |
| WMB | $88.0B | 33.7× | 17.8× | 7.4× | 13.8% | — | 21.9% | 20.4% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,736 |
| EPD | $85.1B | — | 12.7× | 1.6× | -6.4% | 26.7% | 11.0% | — | — | 3.7× | 1,573 |
| EOG | $78.3B | 15.8× | 7.6× | 3.5× | -4.5% | — | 22.0% | 16.7% | 13.2% | 0.7× | 1,525 |
| SLB | $76.4B | 21.8× | — | 2.1× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 1,624 |
| ET | $72.8B | — | 9.8× | 0.8× | 3.5% | 25.8% | 5.2% | 9.0% | 3.8% | 4.8× | 1,244 |
| KMI | $70.8B | 23.2× | 14.3× | 4.2× | 12.2% | — | 18.0% | 9.8% | 4.8% | 4.5× | 1,745 |
| TRGP | $62.7B | 34.4× | 16.5× | 3.7× | 3.9% | 38.3% | 11.3% | 62.7% | 9.4% | 3.6× | 979 |
| TS | $60.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 248 |
| MPLX | $60.3B | — | — | 4.6× | 8.9% | — | 38.1% | — | — | — | 622 |
| LNG | $59.0B | 11.1× | 7.7× | 3.0× | 27.2% | — | 26.7% | 67.3% | 17.3% | 2.2× | 1,303 |
| OKE | $58.9B | 17.2× | 12.4× | 1.8× | 55.0% | 30.5% | 10.1% | 15.1% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,622 |
| OXY | $58.0B | 36.5× | — | 2.7× | -1.9% | — | 11.0% | 6.6% | 4.2% | — | 1,250 |
| BKR | $56.8B | — | — | 2.0× | -0.3% | — | 9.3% | 13.7% | 13.3% | — | 1,095 |
| FANG | $54.8B | 33.6× | 11.0× | 3.6× | 35.8% | — | 11.1% | 4.5% | 3.2% | 2.3× | 1,141 |
| UUUU | $2.8B | — | — | 42.7× | -15.6% | 20.9% | -130% | -12.6% | -6.3% | -7.1× | 335 |
Peers = companies sharing UUUU's sector (Energy) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.