Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: -0.31% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $16.67 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 8.6%/yr for a decade (off $13M normalized FCF).
2-stage DCF · 0.03B shares · net debt -$214M
mean 37.5% · volatility σ 465% · implied rate exceeded in 3/7 yrs
Central path = implied 8.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (465%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHP | $439.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 713 |
| LIN | $215.3B | 31.4× | 19.3× | 6.3× | 3.0% | — | 20.3% | 18.0% | 10.9% | 2.1× | 2,148 |
| SCCO | $162.1B | 37.4× | 20.9× | 12.1× | 17.4% | 60.1% | 32.4% | 39.4% | 24.4% | 0.9× | 791 |
| CX | $147.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 297 |
| TX | $116.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 139 |
| FCX | $101.8B | — | 12.3× | 3.9× | 1.8% | 28.2% | 16.0% | 22.0% | 14.7% | 1.1× | 1,775 |
| AEM | $100.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,066 |
| SHW | $79.5B | 31.3× | — | 3.4× | 2.1% | 48.8% | 10.9% | 55.9% | 17.0% | — | 1,610 |
| ECL | $76.6B | 37.3× | 22.5× | 4.8× | 2.2% | 44.5% | 12.9% | 21.2% | 19.5% | 0.3× | 1,619 |
| B | $73.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 979 |
| WPM | $69.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 809 |
| APD | $63.7B | — | 90.0× | 5.3× | -0.5% | 31.4% | -3.3% | -2.6% | -2.6% | 0.1× | 1,702 |
| VALE | $61.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| NUE | $61.2B | 35.3× | — | 1.9× | 5.7% | 11.9% | 5.4% | 8.3% | 8.3% | — | 1,325 |
| CRH | $58.0B | 15.7× | 9.3× | 1.6× | 5.3% | 36.1% | 10.0% | 15.6% | 9.2% | 2.2× | 9 |
| MT | $57.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 286 |
| DD | $53.6B | — | — | 7.8× | 1.9% | 34.5% | -11.4% | -5.6% | -5.6% | — | 1,172 |
| AU | $51.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| FNV | $51.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 614 |
| NTR | $37.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 718 |
| STLD | $35.6B | 30.7× | 19.2× | 2.0× | 3.6% | 13.2% | 6.5% | 13.2% | 9.0% | 2.1× | 893 |
| KGC | $34.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 630 |
| VMC | $31.9B | 30.1× | 15.3× | 4.0× | 7.1% | 27.4% | 13.6% | 12.6% | 8.4% | 1.8× | 981 |
| MLM | $29.8B | 26.3× | 16.9× | 4.8× | 8.6% | 30.7% | 18.5% | 11.3% | 7.4% | 2.6× | 1,022 |
| PPG | $23.6B | 15.2× | — | 1.5× | 0.2% | 41.3% | 9.9% | 19.8% | 10.3% | — | 1,003 |
| VHI | $493M | — | — | 0.2× | -1.3% | 14.2% | -2.8% | -5.6% | -5.6% | — | 63 |
Peers = companies sharing VHI's sector (Basic Materials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $9M dividends + $0 buybacks = $9M returned on -$82M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -6%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $214M covers the $34M due within a year 6.3× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2012-12-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 18th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 53.0× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 66.5 | 77.1 | 77.7 | 74.7 | 77.9 | 87.2 | 79.8 | 85.8 |
| Gross Profit | 33.5 | 22.9 | 22.3 | 25.3 | 22.1 | 12.8 | 20.2 | 14.2 |
| R&D | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| SG&A | 17.0 | 15.5 | 15.3 | 13.6 | 13.7 | 14.4 | 12.2 | 15.0 |
| Operating Income | 20.4 | 10.2 | 10.1 | 13.9 | 10.8 | 1.8 | 10.0 | 3.0 |
| Income Tax | -1.7 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 1.7 | -1.3 | 3.9 | 0.6 |
| Net Income | 14.4 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 5.5 | 3.9 | -0.5 | 5.1 | -2.8 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on VHI: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.08B 100.0% | $2.10B 100.0% | $1.92B 100.0% | $2.22B 100.0% | $2.30B 100.0% | $1.85B 100.0% | $1.90B 100.0% | $1.82B 100.0% | $1.88B 100.0% | $1.52B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.78B 85.8% | $1.68B 79.8% | $1.68B 87.2% | $1.73B 77.9% | $1.72B 74.7% | $1.44B 77.7% | $1.46B 77.1% | $1.21B 66.5% | $1.27B 67.4% | $1.21B 79.7% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1.28B 68.0% | $1.22B 80.2% |
| Gross Profit | $295.4M 14.2% | $424.5M 20.2% | $245.2M 12.8% | $490.4M 22.1% | $580.2M 25.3% | $412.1M 22.3% | $434.6M 22.9% | $609.2M 33.5% | $612.9M 32.6% | $307.9M 20.3% |
| Research & Development | $17.0M 0.8% | $14.0M 0.7% | $18.0M 0.9% | $16.0M 0.7% | $17.0M 0.7% | $16.0M 0.9% | $17.0M 0.9% | $16.0M 0.9% | $19.0M 1.0% | $13.0M 0.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $312.3M 15.0% | $256.2M 12.2% | $277.4M 14.4% | $304.0M 13.7% | $311.9M 13.6% | $283.6M 15.3% | $294.2M 15.5% | $310.0M 17.0% | $262.6M 14.0% | $232.6M 15.3% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $2.18B 104.9% | $1.92B 91.3% | $2.00B 103.9% | $2.10B 94.3% | $2.08B 90.5% | $1.78B 96.1% | $1.83B 96.6% | $1.65B 90.8% | $1.61B 85.8% | $1.52B 100.0% |
| Operating Income | $63.3M 3.0% | $210.7M 10.0% | $34.2M 1.8% | $239.4M 10.8% | $318.6M 13.9% | $186.1M 10.1% | $192.7M 10.2% | $370.7M 20.4% | $380.3M 20.2% | $119.2M 7.8% |
| Interest Expense | $57.1M 2.7% | $49.9M 2.4% | $28.3M 1.5% | $27.9M 1.3% | $32.5M 1.4% | $36.2M 2.0% | $40.8M 2.2% | $55.7M 3.1% | $58.9M 3.1% | $58.1M 3.8% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $16.6M 0.8% | $22.0M 1.0% | $21.3M 1.1% | $10.4M 0.5% | $4.0M 0.2% | $4.7M 0.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $2.5M 0.1% | $4.6M 0.2% | $2.7M 0.1% | $3.0M 0.1% | $2.0M 0.1% | $1.9M 0.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Pretax Income | -$43.0M -2.1% | $244.2M 11.6% | -$19.5M -1.0% | $169.9M 7.6% | $257.8M 11.2% | $100.6M 5.4% | $104.7M 5.5% | $236.2M 13.0% | $291.8M 15.5% | $39.6M 2.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $11.9M 0.6% | $82.9M 3.9% | -$24.6M -1.3% | $36.8M 1.7% | $60.1M 2.6% | $15.9M 0.9% | $26.5M 1.4% | -$30.7M -1.7% | -$120.0M -6.4% | $18.6M 1.2% |
| Net Income | -$57.6M -2.8% | $108.0M 5.1% | -$9.9M -0.5% | $87.2M 3.9% | $127.2M 5.5% | $55.2M 3.0% | $49.2M 2.6% | $262.2M 14.4% | $207.5M 11.0% | -$15.9M -1.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-2.02 | $3.79 | $-0.35 | $3.06 | $4.46 | $1.94 | $1.73 | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-2.02 | $3.79 | $-0.35 | $3.06 | $4.46 | $1.94 | $1.73 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 29 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 28.5M | 28.5M | 28.5M | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 29 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 28.5M | 28.5M | 28.5M | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.