Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: +0.45% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.4M 100.0% | $6.2M 100.0% | $7.2M 100.0% | $10.7M 100.0% | $11.5M 100.0% | $8.5M 100.0% | $5.6M 100.0% | $5.4M 100.0% | $6.0M 100.0% | $5.2M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $4.5M 70.6% | $3.6M 57.9% | $4.2M 58.1% | $5.0M 46.5% | $6.0M 51.9% | $3.9M 46.4% | $3.3M 59.4% | $2.8M 52.6% | $2.2M 36.9% | $2.1M 40.9% |
| Gross Profit | $1.8M 29.1% | $2.6M 41.7% | $3.0M 41.4% | $5.7M 53.2% | $5.5M 47.6% | $4.5M 53.1% | $2.3M 39.9% | $2.5M 46.7% | $3.7M 62.6% | $3.0M 58.4% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.0M 16.3% | $853K 13.8% | $1.1M 14.8% | $1.1M 10.6% | $2.9M 25.0% | $2.2M 25.3% | $2.5M 44.5% | $2.3M 42.9% | $1.6M 26.5% | $1.7M 32.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $2.7M 42.6% | $3.0M 48.0% | $3.2M 44.7% | $3.7M 34.4% | $4.4M 38.5% | $3.4M 40.2% | $3.8M 67.8% | $3.7M 69.8% | $2.7M 44.7% | $2.4M 45.7% |
| Operating Income | -$856K -13.5% | -$392K -6.3% | -$241K -3.3% | $2.0M 18.8% | $1.0M 9.1% | $1.1M 12.8% | -$1.6M -27.9% | -$1.2M -23.1% | $1.1M 18.0% | $659K 12.7% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $78K 1.2% | $170K 2.7% | $155K 2.2% | $139K 1.3% | $122K 1.1% | $127K 1.5% | $135K 2.4% | $127K 2.4% | $178K 3.0% | $108K 2.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $47K 0.7% | $120K 1.9% | -$5K -0.1% | $91K 0.9% | $101K 0.9% | $110K 1.3% | $143K 2.5% | $123K 2.3% | $223K 3.7% | $64K 1.2% |
| Pretax Income | -$809K -12.7% | -$273K -4.4% | -$246K -3.4% | $2.1M 19.7% | $1.1M 9.9% | $1.2M 14.1% | -$1.4M -25.3% | -$1.1M -20.8% | $1.3M 21.7% | $723K 14.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $121K 1.9% | $100K 1.6% | $131K 1.8% | $431K 4.0% | $239K 2.1% | $180K 2.1% | $212K 3.8% | -$97K -1.8% | $92K 1.5% | $106K 2.0% |
| Net Income | -$1.1M -17.4% | -$465K -7.5% | -$55K -0.8% | $906K 8.5% | $743K 6.5% | $680K 8.0% | -$1.6M -29.1% | -$946K -17.7% | $1.1M 19.2% | $573K 11.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.25 | $-0.11 | $-0.01 | $0.20 | $0.17 | $0.16 | $-0.39 | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.25 | $-0.11 | $-0.01 | $0.20 | $0.17 | $0.16 | $4290681.00 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 2.9M | 4.1M | 4.4M | 4.4M | 4.4M | 4.4M | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 2.9M | 4.1M | 4.4M | 4.4M | 4.4M | 4.4M | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
3/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$1M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -11%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 7 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 229 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $858.2B | 39.4× | — | 1.2× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $396.1B | 49.1× | 30.3× | 1.4× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.5× | 4,050 |
| KO | $378.1B | 28.9× | 24.8× | 7.9× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $345.5B | 22.6× | 16.3× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $298.3B | 26.4× | 17.4× | 7.3× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $183.9B | 22.4× | 15.0× | 2.0× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| MO | $117.4B | 17.0× | 13.6× | 5.0× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 31.3% | 2.5× | 2,375 |
| MDLZ | $80.7B | 33.0× | 18.9× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| TGT | $70.0B | 19.0× | 10.2× | 0.7× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| CL | $69.7B | 33.1× | 19.4× | 3.4× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 26.5% | 2.0× | 1,873 |
| MNST | $43.6B | — | 16.4× | 5.3× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| KDP | $43.2B | 20.8× | 14.5× | 2.6× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| FMX | $41.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| ADM | $41.1B | 38.1× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| JBS | $40.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| KR | $39.9B | 39.7× | 10.0× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 4.7% | 3.0× | 1,327 |
| SYY | $38.4B | 21.1× | 9.6× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| HSY | $34.6B | — | 20.3× | 3.0× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| EL | $34.4B | — | 782.5× | 2.4× | -8.2% | 74.0% | -7.9% | -29.3% | -29.3% | 0.1× | 800 |
| KVUE | $34.2B | 23.5× | 11.6× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 12.0% | 0.5× | 967 |
| KMB | $32.6B | 16.2× | 10.3× | 2.0× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KHC | $29.3B | — | — | 1.2× | -3.5% | 33.3% | -23.4% | -14.0% | -14.0% | — | 1,059 |
| DG | $27.1B | 18.0× | 8.0× | 0.6× | 5.2% | 30.7% | 3.5% | 17.8% | 17.8% | — | 1,099 |
| KOF | $23.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 249 |
| CHD | $23.2B | 31.6× | 18.9× | 3.7× | 1.6% | 44.7% | 11.9% | 18.4% | 11.9% | 1.7× | 1,004 |
| WAFU | $4M | — | — | 0.7× | 2.7% | 29.1% | -17.4% | -11.0% | -11.0% | — | 7 |
Peers = companies sharing WAFU's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 7-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 7-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 43.6× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 52.6 | 59.4 | 46.4 | 51.9 | 46.5 | 58.1 | 57.9 | 70.6 |
| Gross Profit | 46.7 | 39.9 | 53.1 | 47.6 | 53.2 | 41.4 | 41.7 | 29.1 |
| SG&A | 42.9 | 44.5 | 25.3 | 25.0 | 10.6 | 14.8 | 13.8 | 16.3 |
| Operating Income | -23.1 | -27.9 | 12.8 | 9.1 | 18.8 | -3.3 | -6.3 | -13.5 |
| Income Tax | -1.8 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Net Income | -17.7 | -29.1 | 8.0 | 6.5 | 8.5 | -0.8 | -7.5 | -17.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on WAFU: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.