Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: +0.14% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $44.49 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -9.6%/yr for a decade (off $56M normalized FCF).
The market's -9.6% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt -$96M
mean 89.8% · volatility σ 703% · implied rate exceeded in 2/8 yrs
Central path = implied -9.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (703%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 22% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $8M dividends + $5M buybacks = $13M returned on $36M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 10%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $276.2M 100.0% | $290.3M 100.0% | $318.0M 100.0% | $351.7M 100.0% | $267.6M 100.0% | $195.4M 100.0% | $304.0M 100.0% | $298.4M 100.0% | $283.7M 100.0% | $296.9M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $156.9M 56.8% | $158.8M 54.7% | $175.2M 55.1% | $207.3M 58.9% | $160.2M 59.9% | $116.8M 59.8% | $180.0M 59.2% | $178.3M 59.8% | $173.1M 61.0% | $184.9M 62.3% |
| Gross Profit | $119.2M 43.2% | $131.5M 45.3% | $142.9M 44.9% | $144.4M 41.1% | $107.4M 40.1% | $78.6M 40.2% | $124.0M 40.8% | $120.1M 40.2% | $110.7M 39.0% | $112.0M 37.7% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $90.1M 32.6% | $94.9M 32.7% | $101.9M 32.0% | $104.0M 29.6% | $81.7M 30.5% | $86.2M 44.1% | $96.9M 31.9% | $94.6M 31.7% | $87.3M 30.8% | $89.3M 30.1% |
| Operating Income | $29.2M 10.6% | $36.6M 12.6% | $41.0M 12.9% | $40.4M 11.5% | $25.7M 9.6% | -$7.6M -3.9% | $27.0M 8.9% | $25.5M 8.5% | $23.4M 8.3% | $22.8M 7.7% |
| Interest Expense | $2K 0.0% | $15K 0.0% | $529K 0.2% | $710K 0.2% | $81K 0.0% | $79K 0.0% | $244K 0.1% | $45K 0.0% | $15K 0.0% | $436K 0.1% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $3.0M 1.1% | $3.7M 1.3% | $1.1M 0.3% | $361K 0.1% | $641K 0.2% | $527K 0.3% | $823K 0.3% | $981K 0.3% | $773K 0.3% | $763K 0.3% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$105K -0.0% | -$444K -0.2% | -$738K -0.2% | -$277K -0.1% | $1.1M 0.4% | $96K 0.0% | -$535K -0.2% | -$638K -0.2% | -$248K -0.1% | -$1.0M -0.3% |
| Pretax Income | $32.0M 11.6% | $39.8M 13.7% | $40.9M 12.8% | $39.7M 11.3% | $27.3M 10.2% | -$7.1M -3.6% | $27.1M 8.9% | $25.8M 8.6% | $23.9M 8.4% | $22.1M 7.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $9.0M 3.2% | $9.5M 3.3% | $10.7M 3.4% | $10.2M 2.9% | $6.8M 2.5% | $1.4M 0.7% | $6.2M 2.0% | $5.8M 1.9% | $7.2M 2.5% | $5.1M 1.7% |
| Net Income | $23.1M 8.4% | $30.3M 10.4% | $30.2M 9.5% | $29.5M 8.4% | $20.6M 7.7% | -$8.5M -4.3% | $20.9M 6.9% | $20.5M 6.9% | $16.5M 5.8% | $16.5M 5.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $2.44 | $3.21 | $3.19 | $3.09 | $2.13 | $-0.87 | $2.11 | $2.01 | $1.61 | $1.57 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $2.41 | $3.16 | $3.17 | $3.07 | $2.12 | $-0.87 | $2.10 | $1.97 | $1.60 | $1.56 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 9.5M | 9.5M | 9.4M | 9.6M | 9.7M | 9.8M | 9.9M | 10.2M | 10.3M | 10.5M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 9.6M | 9.6M | 9.5M | 9.6M | 9.7M | 9.8M | 10.0M | 10.4M | 10.3M | 10.6M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 100th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 4.2× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 59.8 | 59.2 | 59.8 | 59.9 | 58.9 | 55.1 | 54.7 | 56.8 |
| Gross Profit | 40.2 | 40.8 | 40.2 | 40.1 | 41.1 | 44.9 | 45.3 | 43.2 |
| SG&A | 31.7 | 31.9 | 44.1 | 30.5 | 29.6 | 32.0 | 32.7 | 32.6 |
| Operating Income | 8.5 | 8.9 | -3.9 | 9.6 | 11.5 | 12.9 | 12.6 | 10.6 |
| Income Tax | 1.9 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Net Income | 6.9 | 6.9 | -4.3 | 7.7 | 8.4 | 9.5 | 10.4 | 8.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on WEYS: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.65T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.34T | 331.6× | 142.2× | 14.2× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $608.8B | 59.5× | 24.6× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $448.4B | 33.4× | 32.3× | 7.3× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $301.3B | 21.3× | 14.3× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $199.3B | 134.1× | — | 1.3× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $136.0B | 25.2× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $131.2B | 185.7× | 113.0× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $110.7B | 59.7× | 26.9× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.9B | 16.4× | 12.0× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $102.7B | — | 38.3× | 8.4× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $93.3B | 46.7× | — | 3.2× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $89.1B | 35.2× | 20.7× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $87.3B | 170.2× | 91.9× | 12.4× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $76.2B | 25.8× | 3.7× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $72.5B | 34.0× | 21.6× | 3.2× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $70.5B | 28.2× | 19.2× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $70.4B | 49.9× | 24.2× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $68.8B | 16.3× | — | 3.8× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $63.4B | 41.1× | 25.1× | 2.8× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $53.1B | — | 4.4× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $53.1B | 17.0× | — | 1.1× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| EBAY | $49.0B | 25.1× | 17.8× | 4.4× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.8B | 19.7× | 13.3× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $45.0B | 29.5× | 19.4× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| WEYS | $418M | 18.2× | 10.1× | 1.5× | -4.9% | 43.2% | 8.4% | 9.6% | 9.6% | — | 79 |
Peers = companies sharing WEYS's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.