Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: -0.09% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $4.40 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -33.1%/yr for a decade (off $41M normalized FCF).
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares (market data) · net debt $2M
mean -114.4% · volatility σ 248% · implied rate exceeded in 1/5 yrs
Central path = implied -33.1%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (248%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $258.9M 100.0% | $182.6M 100.0% | $2.50B 100.0% | $4.14B 100.0% | $6.25B 100.0% | $6.43B 100.0% | $5.81B 100.0% | $3.65B 100.0% | $2.05B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $159.7M 61.7% | $112.4M 61.5% | $1.84B 73.6% | $3.34B 80.6% | $4.94B 79.1% | $5.10B 79.3% | $4.34B 74.7% | $2.71B 74.2% | $1.55B 75.9% |
| Gross Profit | $99.2M 38.3% | $70.2M 38.5% | $92.4M 3.7% | $118.9M 2.9% | $1.31B 20.9% | $1.33B 20.7% | $1.47B 25.3% | $939.5M 25.8% | $494.7M 24.1% |
| Research & Development | $45.3M 17.5% | $46.2M 25.3% | $51.5M 2.1% | $77.3M 1.9% | $515.1M 8.2% | $538.0M 8.4% | $430.8M 7.4% | $263.2M 7.2% | $153.8M 7.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $29.3M 11.3% | $24.9M 13.6% | $26.8M 1.1% | $35.1M 0.8% | $258.3M 4.1% | $261.8M 4.1% | $248.5M 4.3% | $214.0M 5.9% | $114.9M 5.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $128.4M 49.6% | $117.5M 64.3% | $122.8M 4.9% | $180.7M 4.4% | $1.21B 19.4% | $1.16B 18.0% | $861.3M 14.8% | $573.7M 15.7% | $312.7M 15.3% |
| Operating Income | -$29.2M -11.3% | -$47.3M -25.9% | -$30.4M -1.2% | -$61.9M -1.5% | $93.9M 1.5% | $174.2M 2.7% | $606.5M 10.4% | $365.7M 10.0% | $182.0M 8.9% |
| Interest Expense | $5.7M 2.2% | $5.6M 3.0% | $6.7M 0.3% | $57.0M 1.4% | $44.9M 0.7% | $22.6M 0.4% | — | — | — |
| Pretax Income | -$35.5M -13.7% | -$57.9M -31.7% | -$34.6M -1.4% | -$55.9M -1.3% | $106.7M 1.7% | $265.6M 4.1% | $652.4M 11.2% | $386.6M 10.6% | $191.9M 9.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $2.5M 1.0% | $13.7M 7.5% | -$2.4M -0.1% | -$9.9M -0.2% | $10.7M 0.2% | $31.2M 0.5% | $77.9M 1.3% | $52.0M 1.4% | $27.6M 1.3% |
| Net Income | -$40.1M -15.5% | -$75.7M -41.5% | -$31.0M -1.2% | -$43.2M -1.0% | $137.8M 2.2% | $228.8M 3.6% | $575.2M 9.9% | $340.0M 9.3% | $167.7M 8.2% |
| Per Share | |||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.16 | $-0.29 | $-0.13 | $-0.18 | $0.55 | $0.92 | $2.35 | $0.54 | $0.68 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.16 | $-0.29 | $-0.13 | $-0.18 | $0.52 | $0.88 | $2.24 | $0.51 | $0.65 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 254.4M | 258.9M | 243.1M | 246.3M | 252.2M | 248.5M | 243.6M | 211.9M | 67.8M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 254.4M | 258.9M | 243.1M | 246.3M | 264.4M | 260.4M | 256.0M | 225.0M | 76.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $1M buybacks = $1M returned on -$26M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 9 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -15%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 9 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~9.6% on $59M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 32 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| ZEPP | $65M | — | — | 0.3× | 41.8% | 38.3% | -15.5% | -18.7% | -14.6% | -2.4× | 32 |
Peers = companies sharing ZEPP's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 8-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 8-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 74.2 | 74.7 | 79.3 | 79.1 | 80.6 | 73.6 | 61.5 | 61.7 |
| Gross Profit | 25.8 | 25.3 | 20.7 | 20.9 | 2.9 | 3.7 | 38.5 | 38.3 |
| R&D | 7.2 | 7.4 | 8.4 | 8.2 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 25.3 | 17.5 |
| SG&A | 5.9 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 13.6 | 11.3 |
| Operating Income | 10.0 | 10.4 | 2.7 | 1.5 | -1.5 | -1.2 | -25.9 | -11.3 |
| Income Tax | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | -0.2 | -0.1 | 7.5 | 1.0 |
| Net Income | 9.3 | 9.9 | 3.6 | 2.2 | -1.0 | -1.2 | -41.5 | -15.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ZEPP: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.